Update on the Management of Rosacea: A Status Report on the Current Role and New Horizons With Topical Azelaic Acid

December 2014 | Volume 13 | Issue 12 | Supplement Individual Articles | 101 | Copyright © December 2014


James Q. Del Rosso DO FAOCDa and Leon H. Kircik MDb

aLas Vegas Skin and Cancer Clinics/West Dermatology Group, Henderson, NV; Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, NV
bIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;
Physicians Skin Care, PLLC, Louisville, KY

table 3
current AARS recommendations emphasize selecting therapy based on correlation with the clinical manifestations present in the individual patient and, as best as possible, the pathophysiologic mechanisms that are likely to be contributory.
Azaleic acid 15% gel was approved by the FDA on December 24 2002 for the treatment of papulopustular lesions of rosacea.22 The statement “the mechanism(s) by which azelaic acid interferes with the pathogenic events in rosacea are unknown” was written in the approved product labeling over a decade ago.40 Azaleic acid has been shown to exhibit multiple pharmacologic properties.24,48 These include:
  • Reduction in follicular keratinization in human skin in vivo and in vitro.
  • In vitro evidence of antioxidant effects, including scavenger activity against hydroxyl radicals, inhibition of hydroxyradical- induced toxicity, and inhibition of oxyradical release from neutrophils.
  • Competitive inhibition of tyrosinase and inhibition of mitochondrial respiratory enzymes in abnormal melanocytes.
  • Comedolytic activity and reduction in follicular keratinization support the development and FDA approval of AzA 20% cream for the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris. However, other than a possible contribution by antioxidant activity (if it occurs in vivo in rosacea-affected skin), none of the aforementioned pharmacologic effects of AzA are known to correlate with pathophysiologic mechanisms thought to be operative in rosacea. It is important to recognize that approved product labeling does not necessarily reflect current evidence related to how a given therapeutic agent may modulate the pathophysiology of disease, and that product labeling is not automatically updated by the FDA based on new evidence.
    The augmented immune response and detection that is characteristic of rosacea-prone skin refers primarily to studies demonstrating upregulation of the cathelicidin (LL-37) production pathway in the facial skin of patients with PPR.4,9-12
    The increased expression of toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2) is also consistent with the hyper-responsive nature of central facial skin of rosacea when exposed to exogenous trigger factors.9 Interestingly, over the past 5 years, a series of in vitro studies performed with murine or human skin showed that AzA directly inhibited the following: (1) kallikrein 5 (KLK5) in cultured keratinocytes, (2) gene expression of KLK5, (3) TLR2 expression, and (4) cathelicidin (LL-37) formation.12,49 An in vivo 16-week study performed in patients with PPR demonstrated that cathelicidin and KLK5 activity decrease with AZA 15% gel exposure; subjects with rosacea showed reduction in cathelicidin and KLK5 messenger RNA after treatment with AzA 15% gel twice daily.49 These data performed in keratinocyte cell cultures, in murine skin, and in the facial skin of adult subjects with PPR support that inhibition of the upregulated cathelicidin pathway and possibly inhibition of TLR2 expression in rosacea-affected skin at least partially explain the therapeutic effects of AzA 15% gel in patients with PPR.
    The efficacy of AzA 15% gel is greatest in those subjects with PPR who exhibit higher baseline levels of KLK5, further supporting this mode of action.49
    This information on possible modes of action of AzA in PPR may also account to some extent for the observation of augmented benefit when AzA 15% gel is used in combination with doxycycline because this latter agent inhibits the upregulated cathelicidin pathway at a different step in the cathelicidin cascade of inflammation (inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases).12,50