Update on the Management of Rosacea: A Status Report on the Current Role and New Horizons With Topical Azelaic Acid

December 2014 | Volume 13 | Issue 12 | Supplement Individual Articles | 101 | Copyright © December 2014


James Q. Del Rosso DO FAOCDa and Leon H. Kircik MDb

aLas Vegas Skin and Cancer Clinics/West Dermatology Group, Henderson, NV; Touro University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, NV
bIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;
Physicians Skin Care, PLLC, Louisville, KY

  • The percutaneous penetration of AzA was shown to be approximately 8-fold greater after application of AzA 15% gel compared with AzA 20% cream based on results from an in vitro Franz flow-through diffusion cell test in murine skin.25
  • Skin Barrier Effects
    Sensitive skin is common in rosacea patients, with increased centrofacial transepidermal water loss reported in those with centrofacial erythema both with and without papulopustular lesions.1,5,13,43
  • Application-site stinging and/or burning, reported in a subset of patients treated with AzA 15% gel, are usually transient in duration, mild to moderate in severity, no longer occurring after the first week to a few weeks of use in many patients, and not commonly resulting in discontinued use of the AzA 15% gel.19,25,26,28,36,44 These symptoms are not associated with visible skin changes suggestive of contact dermatitis or contact urticaria, but rather are neurosensory and idiosyncratic in nature.38
  • Regular proper skin care with a gentle cleanser and wellformulated moisturizer has been shown to reduce the likelihood, frequency, and intensity of stinging and burning after application of AzA 15% gel in most rosacea patients who experience these idiosyncratic effects.15,24,25,44,45
  • An in vitro modified Franz diffusion chamber test performed with human skin showed that applying 1 of 3 studied brand moisturizer lotions (CeraVe® Moisturizing Lotion, Cetaphil® Moisturizing Lotion, Dove® lotions) before applying AzA 15% gel did not reduce the percutaneous penetration of AzA, and in some cases resulted in an incremental increase in percutaneous penetration compared with applying the moisturizer after applying the AzA 15% gel. The study results suggested that any of the 3 tested moisturizers may be applied either before or after AzA 15% gel without a major change in the percutaneous penetration/ absorption profile of AzA.39
  • In a split-face, investigator-blinded, 12-week study of 40 subjects with PPR, the idiosyncratic neurocutaneous symptoms of stinging and burning that affect a subset of rosacea patients treated with AzA 15% gel were shown not to be related to worsening of the epidermal permeability barrier function by the medication.46 One side of the face was treated with AzA 15% gel twice daily, and the other side remained untreated. The results were as follows:
  • Decline in skin hydration measured by corneometry was greater on the untreated side. There was an increase in skin hydration at week 1 compared with baseline on the AzA-treated side (P=.009).
  • Investigator assessments of parameters such as facial erythema, desquamation, and overall facial appearance were scored using a 6-point ordinal scale (Table 1). Subjects used this same scale to report symptoms.
  • A statistically significant decrease in overall facial erythema was also noted on the treated side at week 2 (P=.003) and week 4 (P<.001) (Figure 1).
  • Overall facial appearance assessment was statistically superior on the treated side at week 2 (P=.005) and week 4 (P<.001).
  • A statistically significant decrease in desquamation was noted on the treated side over the untreated side at each time point (P<.001) (Figure 2).
  • Longitudinal analysis showed an increase in desquamation on the untreated side at 48 hours, week 1, week 2, and week 4 (Figure 2).
  • There was no increase noted in facial stinging and itching at any time point on the treated side. By week 4, there was a reduction in itching in both groups.
  • This study supports that AzA 15% gel does not appear to induce impairment of the epidermal permeability barrier, and improves signs and symptoms of rosacea, including skin changes inherent to rosacea-prone facial skin. This supports that the disease state itself is associated with epidermal permeability barrier impairment that is often not visibly evident or may present with visible signs such as fine facial scaling (“rosacea dermatitis”).5,43-46
    table 1
    Efficacy and Safety
    The efficacy and safety of AzA 15% gel for PPR have been demonstrated in multiple studies, both as monotherapy and in combination with oral therapy (ie, doxycycline); no major cutaneous or systemic safety issues have been associated with AzA 15% gel.19,26-29,31-34,36,37