IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines

October 2021 | Volume 20 | Issue 10 | Original Article | 1052 | Copyright © October 2021


Published online September 28, 2021

Martina Kerscher MD PhD,a Sabrina Fabi MD,b Tanja Fischer MD PhD,c Michael Gold MD,d John Joseph MD,e Welf Prager MD,f Berthold Rzany MD ScM,g Steve Yoelin MD,h Susanna Roll Dr. med,i Gudrun Klein PhD,i Corey Maas MD PhDj

aUniversit t Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
bCosmetic Laser Dermatology, San Diego, CA
cHaut- & Lasercentrum, Potsdam, Germany
dGold Skin Care Center, Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Nashville, TN
eJohn Joseph MD, Private Practice, Beverly Hills, CA
fPrager and Partner Dermatologische Praxis, Hamburg, Germany
gHaut rzte RZANY&HUND, Berlin, Germany
hMedical Associates, Inc., Newport Beach, CA
iMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
jThe Maas Clinic, San Francisco, CA



Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Duration of effect as assessed by the primary efficacy variable increased with increasing dose of INCO (for Kaplan-Meier curves, see Figure 2). The median duration of ≥1 point improvement from baseline was 175 days (25 weeks) for the 20U group, 185 days (26 weeks) for the 50U group, 210 days (30 weeks) for the 75U group, and 215 days (31 weeks) for the 100U group (see Table 2 for median durations with 95% CIs).

Pairwise comparisons of dose groups based on hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard regression performed over the entire 360-day follow-up period indicated significantly longer duration of effect for 100U vs 20U INCO (HR=0.56 [95% CI 0.38, 0.83]; P=0.0035) and for 100U vs 50U (HR=0.55 [95% CI 0.37, 0.81]; P=0.0023) despite the study not being powered for confirmatory statistical significance testing between the dose groups.

Secondary and Other Efficacy Endpoints
The median duration of an effect defined as FWS score of none (0) or mild (1) at maximum frown and as 2-point improvement on the FWS for each INCO dose group is shown in Table 2. In line with the primary efficacy variable, both secondary duration of effect variables consistently increased with increasing dose. For the response rate defined as ≥ 1 point improvement as determined by the investigator (Figure 3, top) and subject (Figure 3, bottom), there was a clear dose-response relationship across INCO dose groups with increasing doses resulting in a greater percentage of responders over time for higher doses.