Topical S. aureus – Targeting Endolysin Significantly Improves Symptoms and QoL in Individuals With Atopic Dermatitis

December 2021 | Volume 20 | Issue 12 | Original Article | 1323 | Copyright © December 2021


Published online November 29, 2021

Magali Moreau PhD,a Sophie Seité PhD,b Luc Aguilar PhD,c Olivier Da Cruz MSc,d Julia Puech PharmD,d Johan Frieling MD PhD,e Ann’Laure Demessant PharmDb

aL’Oréal Recherche & Innovation, Clark, NJ
bLa Roche Posay Dermatological Laboratories, Levallois Perret, France
cL'Oreal R&I, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France
dL’Oréal R&I, Chevilly Larue, France
eMicreos Human Health, Bilthoven,The Netherlands

treatments in AD adults and children. Using Endobioma as adjunctive therapy to boost efficacy of medical treatments and potentially reduce their length of use would be interesting and should be further investigated.

In this era of increasing antibiotic resistance, Endobioma mechanism of action makes it an attractive, precise, antimicrobial solution.31 The recognition and lytic activity are highly specific to S. aureus cell wall, excluding impact on other bacteria even within the same genus.32,33 Unlike antibiotics, Endobioma has little risk of developing resistance.26 Resistance mechanisms such as active efflux from the cell or decreased membrane permeability are avoided due to the external application.34 Moreover, S. aureus membrane peptidoglycans is a highly preserved structure, difficult to alter. Last, Endobioma-triggered cell wall destruction is independent of host metabolism, so there is no pressure for the bacteria to evolve.27

Our study adds new evidence to the potential and current trend to target the skin microbiome for AD management as we further understand the role of skin microbiome dysbiosis and S. aureus in its pathogenesis.11 Though follow-up studies should be conducted to assess the effect of Endobioma on the skin microbiome composition, our results both show the rapid anti-S. aureus activity of the cream in vitro and its efficacy in managing AD in vivo.

The clinical improvements shown in this study confirm previous, preliminary case report of three cases of recurrent S. aureus-related dermatoses that were successfully treated with the endolysin-containing cream.35 When used in a double-blind, vehicle-controlled study in conjunction with TCS, the endolysin-cream failed to demonstrate an effect on corticosteroid use (MAAS study).35 However, prior to inclusion, patients were treated for 2 weeks with a moderate TCS dose, dramatically reducing their AD severity, and could continue using TCS with the endolysin-cream. Both factors could have contributed to masking the full benefit of endolysin vs vehicle. For those reasons and to really gauge the benefit of this new technology, we chose to use the Endobioma-containing cream as a monotherapy in patients with a higher initial SCORAD.

Of interest is the rapidity of the benefits observed with Endobioma. SCORAD was reduced by 43% after 7 days and 68% by 14 days. In a similar study design, the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) and the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI) were reduced by 51% and 54% after 2 weeks.36 Although numerical improvement comparison is difficult with different scoring scales, our study showed an itch severity reduction of 74% at day 14 compared to 61% in the other study.

Poor adherence to AD treatment associated with side effects, treatment length or “corticophobia”, is a known problem and can lead to S. aureus recolonization and flares.37 Rapidly effective, TCS-free, with an inherent respect for the skin microbiota, and without observed side effects, Endobioma cream represents an attractive AD treatment solution. Additionally, our study highlighted a good cosmetic acceptability which may improve treatment compliance, potentially reducing flares. Interestingly, in the MAAS study38 the number of doctor-reported flares was lower in the Endobioma group than in the vehicle group. Altogether, these results suggest that it would be worth assessing the long-term benefits of Endobioma as a proactive therapy to prevent and reduce the occurrence of flares and assess compliance.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that S. aureus-targeting Endobioma cream monotherapy produced a statistically and clinically significant reduction of AD severity scores and improved skin sensitivity and QoL in both adults and children. Safety and tolerability were excellent, enabling Endobioma to be applied to sensitive areas, thus, constituting a good option for AD patches in children. Future investigation assessing the in vivo effect of Endobioma-cream on the skin microbiome, particularly S. aureus, and immune response markers would be interesting to further understand the interplay between skin microbiome, skin immune response and AD clinical symptoms occurrence. Since Endobioma-cream is safe and offers an opportunity to prevent S. aureus over-colonization, it may be beneficial to prevent and reduce flares.

DISCLOSURES

Ann’Laure Demessant, Magali Moreau, Sophie Seité, Luc Aguilar, Olivier Da Cruz and Julia Puech are L’Oréal employees. Johan Frieling is a Micreos Human Health employee.

Funding: The in vitro study was funded by L’Oreal R & I; the clinical study was funded by L'Oreal and La Roche Posay. The study product was provided by Micreos Human Health.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank Charlotte Wright, Speak the Speech Consulting, for her assistance in drafting and editing this manuscript and the Micreos team for helpful comments.

REFERENCES

  1. Kowalska-OlÄ™dzka E, Czarnecka M, Baran A. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in Europe. J Drug Assess. 2019;8(1):126-128. 
  2. Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: Global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66 Suppl 1:8-16.
  3. Hendricks AJ, Eichenfield LF, Shi VY. The impact of airborne pollution on atopic dermatitis: A literature review. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(1):16-23.
  4. Barrett A, Hahn-Pedersen J, Kragh N, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in atopic dermatitis and chronic hand eczema in adults. Patient. 2019;12(5):445-459.
  5. Halvorsen JA, Lien L, Dalgard F, et al. Suicidal ideation, mental health problems, and social function in adolescents with eczema: A population- based study. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(7):1847-1854.
  6. Silverberg JI, Gelfand JM, Margolis DJ, et al. Patient burden and quality of life in atopic dermatitis in US adults: A population-based cross-sectional study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(3):340-347.
  7. Drucker AM, Wang AR, Li WQ, et al. The burden of atopic dermatitis: Summary of a report for the National Eczema Association. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):26-30.
  8. Weidinger S, Beck LA, Bieber T, et al. Atopic dermatitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):1.
  9. Totté JE, van der Feltz WT, Hennekam M, et al. Prevalence and odds of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(4):687-695.
  10. Paller AS, Kong HH, Seed P, et al. The microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):26-35.
  11. Hwang J, Jaros J, Shi VY. Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis: Past, present, and future. Dermatitis. 2020;31(4):247-258.
  12. Wei W, Ghorayeb E, Andria M, et al. A real-world study evaluating adeQUacy of existing systemic treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (QUEST-AD): Baseline treatment patterns and unmet needs assessment. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(4):381-388.e382.
  13. Brandt EB, Sivaprasad U. Th2 cytokines and atopic dermatitis. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2011;2(3).
  14. Nakamura Y, Oscherwitz J, Cease KB, et al. Staphylococcus δ-toxin induces allergic skin disease by activating mast cells. Nature. 2013;503(7476):397- 401.
  15. Mack MR, Kim BS. The itch-scratch cycle: A neuroimmune perspective. Trends Immunol. 2018;39(12):980-991.
  16. Borgoño CA, Michael IP, Komatsu N, et al. A potential role for multiple tissue kallikrein serine proteases in epidermal desquamation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(6):3640-3652.
  17. Yosipovitch G, Misery L, Proksch E, et al. Skin barrier damage and itch: Review of mechanisms, topical management and future directions. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(13):1201-1209.
  18. Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(5):657-682.
  19. van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Arents BWM. Emollients and moisturizers for eczema: Abridged Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(5):1256-1271.
  20. Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic dermatitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(10):590-598.
  21. Charman CR, Morris AD, Williams HC. Topical corticosteroid phobia in patients with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):931-936.
  22. Bos B, Antonescu I, Osinga H, et al. Corticosteroid phobia (corticophobia) in parents of young children with atopic dermatitis and their health care providers. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019;36(1):100-104.
  23. Niebuhr M, Mai U, Kapp A, et al. Antibiotic treatment of cutaneous infections with Staphylococcus aureus in patients with atopic dermatitis: current antimicrobial resistances and susceptibilities. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(11):953-957.
  24. Hepburn L, Hijnen DJ, Sellman BR, et al. The complex biology and contribution of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis, current and future therapies. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(1):63-71.
  25. van Zyl LJ, Abrahams Y, Stander EA, et al. Novel phages of healthy skin metaviromes from South Africa. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12265.
  26. Schmelcher M, Donovan DM, Loessner MJ. Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(10):1147-1171.
  27. Herpers BL BP, Pietersma F, Eichenseher F, et al. Specific lysis of methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the Endolysin Staphefekt SA.100 TM. 24th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) 2014; Barcelona, Spain.
  28. Herpers BL, Leeson N. Endolysins: redefining antibacterial therapy. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(3):309-311.
  29. Fluit A, Van Marm S, Eichenseher F, et al. Killing and lysis of Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci by an Endolysin. 52nd ICAAC; 2012; San Francisco.
  30. George SM, Karanovic S, Harrison DA, et al. Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(10).
  31. Gondil VS, Harjai K, Chhibber S. Endolysins as emerging alternative therapeutic agents to counter drug-resistant infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(2):105844.
  32. Loessner MJ, Wendlinger G, Scherer S. Heterogeneous endolysins in listeria monocytogenes bacteriophages: a new class of enzymes and evidence for conserved holin genes within the siphoviral lysis cassettes. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16(6):1231-1241.
  33. Schmelcher M, Shabarova T, Eugster MR, et al. Rapid multiplex detection and differentiation of listeria cells by use of fluorescent phage endolysin cell wall binding domains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(17):5745-5756.
  34. Haddad Kashani H, Schmelcher M, Sabzalipoor H, et al. Recombinant endolysins as potential therapeutics against antibiotic-resistant staphylococcus aureus: Current status of research and novel delivery strategies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(1).
  35. Totté JEE, van Doorn MB, Pasmans S. Successful treatment of chronic Staphylococcus aureus-related dermatoses with the topical Endolysin Staphefekt SA.100: A report of 3 cases. Case Rep Dermatol. 2017;9(2):19-25.
  36. Capone K, Kirchner F, Klein SL, et al. Effects of colloidal oatmeal topical atopic dermatitis cream on skin microbiome and skin barrier properties. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5):524-531.
  37. Patel N, Feldman SR. Adherence in atopic dermatitis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1027:139-159.
  38. de Wit J, Totté JEE, van Mierlo MMF, et al. Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(3):860-863.

AUTHOR CORRESPONDENCE

Ann'Laure Demessant PharmD anne-laure.demessant@loreal.com