Male Aesthetics: A Review of Facial Anatomy and Pertinent Clinical Implications

September 2015 | Volume 14 | Issue 9 | Original Article | 1029 | Copyright © September 2015


Joshua A. Farhadian,a Bradley S. Bloom,b and Jeremy A. Brauer,a,b,c

aRonald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
bLaser and Skin Surgery Center of New York, New York, NY
cDivision of Dermatology, Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore LIJ, New York, NY

muscle.45 Accordingly, the injection site is low and often near the insertion of the zygomaticus. Superficial microinjections are recommended in this area to avoid inadvertently treating the zygomaticus major and causing an asymmetric upper lip droop. When treating the middle and lower face, the perioral area is not a common injection site due to the relative lack of perioral rhytides in men. Caution must be taken prior to treating masseter hypertrophy in men to ensure that true muscular hypertrophy exists, as opposed to normal lateral flaring of the mandibular ramus.39
Dermal fillers are useful in male patients who struggle with volume loss given their relative lack of subcutaneous fat. Filler can also be used to augment masculine facial features or eliminate deep rhytides. The cheek is a common area of concern for men seeking cosmetic augmentation. Overcorrection, especially by administering too much volume medially or laterally, can result in a feminine appearance. Special care must also be taken when injecting mens’ lips, since overfilling, especially the upper lip, is feminizing.
Rhinoplasty is the second most common cosmetic surgery performed in men.1 For those seeking a non-surgical alternative, soft tissue fillers can be used to augment the radix and nasal dorsum. Dermal filler can also be used in improve definition in the chin and jaw.

CONCLUSION

Male aesthetics is a new frontier in cosmetic dermatology. With the number of men seeking noninvasive cosmetic procedures increasing each year, aesthetic dermatologists should become familiar with male facial anatomy. While the procedures performed in men and women are the same, the application, objectives, and parameters are often very different. Disregarding or minimizing gender when treating a male patient can result in poor cosmetic outcomes and decrease patient satisfaction.

DISCLOSURES

None of the authors have conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  1. The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Statistics. http://www.surgery.org/media/statistics. Accessed June 8, 2015.
  2. American Society of Dermatologic Surgery. 2014 ASDS Consumer Survey on Cosmetic Dermatologic Procedures. https://www.asds.net/consumer-survey/. Accessed June 8, 2015.
  3. Keaney TC, Alster TS. Botulinum toxin in men: review of relevant anatomy and clinical trial data. Dermatol Surg. Oct 2013;39(10):1434-1443.
  4. Naini FB, Gill DS. Facial aesthetics: concepts and canons. Dent Update. Mar 2008;35(2):102-107.
  5. Ghyka MC. The geometry of art and life. New York: Dover Publications; 1977.
  6. Alam M, Dover JS. On beauty: evolution, psychosocial considerations, and surgical enhancement. Arch Dermatol. Jun 2001;137(6):795-807.
  7. Pancherz H, Knapp V, Erbe C, Heiss AM. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces. World J Orthod. Spring 2010;11(1):27-36.
  8. Naini FB, Moss JP, Gill DS. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Sep 2006;130(3):277-282.
  9. McArdle A, Young R, Kelly MH. Preferences for the white female nasal supratip break. Ann Plast Surg. Apr 2012;68(4):366-368.
  10. Sim RS, Smith JD, Chan AS. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Apr-Jun 2000;2(2):113-120.
  11. Whitaker LA, Morales L, Jr., Farkas LG. Aesthetic surgery of the supraorbital ridge and forehead structures. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1986;78(1):23-32.
  12. Dempf R, Eckert AW. Contouring the forehead and rhinoplasty in the feminization of the face in male-to-female transsexuals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. Sep 2010;38(6):416-422.
  13. Freund RM, Nolan WB, 3rd. Correlation between brow lift outcomes and aesthetic ideals for eyebrow height and shape in females. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1996;97(7):1343-1348.
  14. Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1997;99(7):1808-1816.
  15. Spiegel JH. Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty. Laryngoscope. Feb 2011;121(2):250-261.
  16. Goldstein SM, Katowitz JA. The male eyebrow: a topographic anatomic analysis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2005;21(4):285-291.
  17. Russell MD, Brown T, Garn SM, et al. The Supraorbital Torus. Current Anthropology. 1985;26:337-360.
  18. Ferembach D, Schwindezky I, Stoukal M. Recommendation for age and sex diagnoses of skeletons. J Hum Evol. 1980;9:517-549.
  19. Pretorius E, Steyn M, Scholtz Y. Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism. Am J Phys Anthropol. Jan 2006;129(1):64-70.
  20. Most SP, Mobley SR, Larrabee WF, Jr. Anatomy of the eyelids. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Nov 2005;13(4):487-492.
  21. Rohrich RJ, Janis JE, Kenkel JM. Male rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2003;112(4):1071-1085.
  22. Swift A. The mathematics of facial beauty. In: Jones D, ed. Injectable fillers:principles and practice. Chichester, West Sussex ; Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Pub.; 2010:140.
  23. Koudelova J, Bruzek J, Caganova V, Krajicek V, Veleminska J. Development of facial sexual dimorphism in children aged between 12 and 15 years: a three-dimensional longitudinal study. Orthod Craniofac Res. Aug 2015;18(3):175-184.
  24. Daniele G, Marina C, Riccardo R, et al. A Quantitative Analysis of Lip Aesthetics: The Influence of Gender and Aging [published online ahead of print May 7 2015]. Aesthetic Plast Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0495-7
  25. De Menezes M, Rosati R, Baga I, Mapelli A, Sforza C. Three-dimensional analysis of labial morphology: effect of sex and age. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Aug 2011;40(8):856-861.
  26. Brown E, Perrett DI. What gives a face its gender? Perception. 1993;22(7):829-840.
  27. Thayer ZM, Dobson SD. Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: implications for adaptive hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthropol. Nov 2010;143(3):417-425.
  28. Loth SR, Henneberg M. Mandibular ramus flexure: a new morphologic indicator of sexual dimorphism in the human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. Mar 1996;99(3):473-485.
  29. Pessa JE, Slice DE, Hanz KR, Broadbent TH, Jr., Rohrich RJ. Aging and the shape of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2008;121(1):196-200.
  30. Weeden JC, Trotman CA, Faraway JJ. Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influence of sex and facial shape. Angle Orthod. Apr 2001;71(2):132-140.
  31. Houstis O, Kiliaridis S. Gender and age differences in facial expressions. Eur J Orthod. Oct 2009;31(5):459-466.
  32. Tsukahara K, Hotta M, Osanai O, Kawada H, Kitahara T, Takema Y. Gender-dependent differences in degree of facial wrinkles. Skin Res Technol. Feb 2013;19(1):e65-71.
  33. Sjostrom L, Smith U, Krotkiewski M, Bjorntorp P. Cellularity in different regions of adipose tissue in young men and women. Metabolism. Dec 1972;21(12):1143-1153.
  34. Bulpitt CJ, Markowe HL, Shipley MJ. Why do some people look older than they should? Postgrad Med J. Sep 2001;77(911):578-581.
  35. Moretti G, Ellis RA, Mescon H. Vascular patterns in the skin of the face. J Invest Dermatol. Sep 1959;33:103-112.
  36. Mayrovitz HN, Regan MB. Gender differences in facial skin blood perfusion during basal and heated conditions determined by laser Doppler flowmetry. Microvasc Res. Mar 1993;45(2):211-218.
  37. Montagna W, Ellis RA. Histology and cytochemistry of human skin. XIII. The blood supply of the hair follicle. J Natl Cancer Inst. Sep 1957;19(3):451-463.
  38. Baker DC, Stefani WA, Chiu ES. Reducing the incidence of hematoma requiring surgical evacuation following male rhytidectomy: a 30-year review of 985 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 2005;116(7):1973-1985.