Natural Moisturizing Factor-Enriched Formulations Compared to a Ceramide-Based Cream

March 2024 | Volume 23 | Issue 3 | 141 | Copyright © March 2024


Published online February 28, 2024

Hilary E. Baldwin MDa, Craig Arrowitz b, James Del Rosso DOc

aAcne Treatment and Research Center, Brooklyn, NY 
bBeiersdorf Inc., Florham, NJ 
cDermatology Research Center, Las Vegas, NV

regression period, similar to the methodologies used in the ceramide plus NMF cream vs ceramide cream study described above. Daily moisturization for 10 days with the ceramide plus NMF lotion resulted in a 49.7% increase in corneometer units compared to baseline (P<0.001), while daily moisturization of the ceramide cream resulted in an increase of 32.4% compared to baseline (P<0.001), with an overall statistical significance in favor of the ceramide plus NMF lotion vs the ceramide cream (P<0.05) (Figure 3).  Once again, the lasting effect of improvement in skin hydration was evaluated at day 15 (5-day regression with no additional moisturization). The ceramide plus NMF lotion 10-day moisturization plus 5-day regression yielded a 35.2% increase from baseline corneometer units (P<0.001), while the ceramide cream yielded a 27.6% increase from baseline corneometer units (P<0.05) (Figure 3). 

DISCUSSION

While the focus on barrier repair with topical moisturization has often centered on the inclusion of ceramides in formulations, the utilization of additional ingredients, including NMFs, has not received adequate attention to their potential importance in moisturizer formulations. In this study, we demonstrate the statistical superiority of both a ceramide plus NMF cream and a ceramide plus NMF lotion compared to a ceramide cream based on recognized objective methods of testing hydration after 10 days of daily application. While all 3 formulations improved skin hydration, as indicated by the significant increase in corneometer units from baseline, the ceramide plus NMF cream and ceramide plus NMF lotion demonstrated a significantly higher increase in skin hydration as compared to baseline and as compared to the ceramide cream.

Ceramides and NMFs are major SC components that contribute to maintaining skin hydration.15 NMFs originate from the breakdown of filaggrin and include hydrophilic amino acids, and their derivatives such as PCA, UCA, lactic acid, sugars, organic acids, peptides, and urea, which collectively are associated with the establishment of a physiologic water gradient in the SC.16-18 

The increased role of NMFs in skin barrier function continues to be elucidated, with recent studies demonstrating the importance of NMFs in skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis (AD).19 Decreases in NMF are attributed to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, which are associated with xerotic skin, increased surface pH, and increased risk for worsening of AD.19 The addition of NMFs in well-formulated topical moisturizers has previously been shown to augment skin hydration by supporting the maintenance of water content in dehydrated conditions, thus retaining the optimal fluidity and function in SC lipid and protein components.20 Exposure of the skin to commonly encountered external daily conditions that can impair epidermal barrier function, including washing, showering, and bathing, or the use of occlusive sanitary products such as diapers, which can deplete important hydrophilic compounds of the SC, including NMFs. This depletion markedly affects the ability of the SC to attract and maintain water, leading to a cascade of events that can steadily progress to severe xerosis and eczematous dermatitis, both associated with pruritus and increased potential for microbial colonization.21,22 These data and the results of our study suggest that the utilization of a moisturizer (cream or lotion) that contains both ceramides and NMFs may be a more optimal formulation, compared to a ceramide cream alone, for maintaining skin hydration, improving barrier function, and decreasing the clinical sequela associated with dry skin. 

DISCLOSURES

Dr Baldwin has acted as an investigator, consultant, and/or speaker for Almirall, Bausch, Cassiopea, EPI Health, Galderma, La Roche-Posay, L’Oreal, Mayne Pharma, Sol-Gel, Sun Pharma, and Vyne. Dr Del Rosso has served as a consultant, investigator, and/or speaker for Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Bausch Health (Ortho Dermatologics), Beiersdorf, Dermavant, EPI Heath, Ferndale, Galderma, Incyte, JEM Health, LaRoche Posay, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Loreal, MC2 Therapeutics, Novan, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Se0nte, SolGel, Sun Pharma, UCB and Unilever. Dr Arrowitz is an employee of Beiersdorf Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. Moroki T. Morphological characteristics and notes of the skin in preclinical toxicity assessment. J Toxicol Pathol. 2023;36:85-94. 
  2. Del Rosso JQ, Levin J. The clinical relevance of maintaining the functional integrity of the stratum corneum in both healthy and disease-affected skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4:22-42.
  3. Green M, Kashetsky N, Feschuk A, et al. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL): Environment and pollution-a systematic review. Skin Health Dis. 2022;2:e104.
  4. Purnamawati S, Indrastuti N, Danarti R, et al. The role of moisturizers in addressing various kinds of dermatitis: A review. Clin Med Res. 2017;15:75-87.
  5. Akdeniz M, Gabriel S, Lichterfeld-Kottner A, et al. Transepidermal water loss in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis update. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:1049-1055.
  6. Ananthapadmanabhan KP, Leyden JJ, Hawkins SS. Recent advances in mild and moisturizing cleansers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18:s80-s88.
  7. Sparr E, Bjorklund S, Dat Pham Q, et al. The stratum corneum barrier-from molecular scale to macroscopic properties. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2023;67:101725.
  8. Pappas A. Epidermal surface lipids. Dermatoendocrinol. 2009;1:72-76.
  9. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17:1063-1072.
  10. Harding CR. The stratum corneum: Structure and function in health and disease. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17 Suppl 1:6-15. 
  11. Rawlings AV, Scott IR, Harding CR, et al. Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;103:731-741.
  12. Szakall A. Properties, origin, and physiological functions of the substances of the keratinized epidermis determining the hydrogen-ion concentration. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol. 1955;201:331- 360.
  13. Weber TM, Kausch M, Rippke F, et al. Treatment of xerosis with a topical formulation containing glyceryl glucoside, natural moisturizing factors, and ceramide. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2012;5:29-39.
  14. Draelos ZD. Modern moisturizer myths, misconceptions, and truths. Cutis. 2013;91:308-314.
  15. Jung K, Kim SH, Joo KM, et al. Oral intake of enzymatically decomposed AP collagen peptides improves skin moisture and ceramide and natural moisturizing factor contents in the stratum corneum. Nutrients. 2021;13(12):4372.
  16. Bouwstra JA, Dubbelaar FE, Gooris GS, et al. The role of ceramide composition in the lipid organisation of the skin barrier. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1419:127-136.
  17. Scott IR , Harding CR. Filaggrin breakdown to water binding compounds during development of the rat stratum corneum is controlled by the water activity of the environment. Dev Biol. 1986;115:84-92.
  18. Scott IR, Harding CR, Barrett JG. Histidine-rich protein of the keratohyalin granules. Source of the free amino acids, urocanic acid and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid in the stratum corneum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982;719:110-117. 
  19. Basu MN, Mortz CG, Jensen TK, et al. Natural moisturizing factors in children with and without eczema: Associations with lifestyle and genetic factors. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:255-262.
  20. Gunnarsson M, Mojumdar EH, Topgaard D, et al. Extraction of natural moisturizing factor from the stratum corneum and its implication on skin molecular mobility. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;604:480-491.
  21. Bjorklund S, Pham QD, Jensen LB, et al. The effects of polar excipients transcutol and dexpanthenol on molecular mobility, permeability, and electrical impedance of the skin barrier. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;479:207-220.
  22. Pham QD, Bjorklund S, Engblom J, et al. Chemical penetration enhancers in stratum corneum - relation between molecular effects and barrier function. J Control Release. 2016;232:175-187.

AUTHOR CORRESPONDENCE

James Del Rosso DO jqdelrosso@yahoo.com