Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and noninvasive assessment technique. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(4):591-605.
11. Regula CG, Yag-Howard C. Suture products and techniques: what to use, where, and why. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41 Suppl 10:S187-200.
12. Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(6):296-302.
13. Byrne M, Aly A. The Surgical Suture. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl_2):S67-S72.
14. Eisen DB, Zhuang AR, Hasan A, Sharon VR, Bang H, Crispin MK. 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020;312(3):179-185.
15. Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee IY, et al. Monocryl suture, a new ultrapliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials. 1995;16(15):1141- 1148.
16. Rosenzweig LB, Abdelmalek M, Ho J, Hruza GJ. Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(7):1126-1129.
17. Ribeiro CM, Silva Junior VA, Silva Neto JC, Vasconcelos BC. Clinical and histopathological study of tissue reactivity to monofilament suture materials: nylon and poliglecaprone 25 in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2005;20(4):284-291.
18. Nary Filho H, Matsumoto MA, Batista AC, Lopes LC, de Goes FC, Consolaro A. Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):86-91.
19. Robinson JK. Surgery of the skin: Procedural dermatology. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.
20. Yag-Howard C. Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: A review for dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40 Suppl 9:S3-S15.
21. Few JW. Rejuvenation of the african american periorbital area: Dynamic considerations. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(3):198-206.
22. Jalalat S, Weiss E. Cosmetic laser procedures in Latin skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(3):s127-131.
23. Dunn DL. Ethicon wound closure manual; Somerville, NJ: Ethicon, Inc.; 2005. Print.
11. Regula CG, Yag-Howard C. Suture products and techniques: what to use, where, and why. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41 Suppl 10:S187-200.
12. Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(6):296-302.
13. Byrne M, Aly A. The Surgical Suture. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl_2):S67-S72.
14. Eisen DB, Zhuang AR, Hasan A, Sharon VR, Bang H, Crispin MK. 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020;312(3):179-185.
15. Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee IY, et al. Monocryl suture, a new ultrapliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials. 1995;16(15):1141- 1148.
16. Rosenzweig LB, Abdelmalek M, Ho J, Hruza GJ. Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(7):1126-1129.
17. Ribeiro CM, Silva Junior VA, Silva Neto JC, Vasconcelos BC. Clinical and histopathological study of tissue reactivity to monofilament suture materials: nylon and poliglecaprone 25 in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2005;20(4):284-291.
18. Nary Filho H, Matsumoto MA, Batista AC, Lopes LC, de Goes FC, Consolaro A. Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):86-91.
19. Robinson JK. Surgery of the skin: Procedural dermatology. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.
20. Yag-Howard C. Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: A review for dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40 Suppl 9:S3-S15.
21. Few JW. Rejuvenation of the african american periorbital area: Dynamic considerations. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(3):198-206.
22. Jalalat S, Weiss E. Cosmetic laser procedures in Latin skin. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(3):s127-131.
23. Dunn DL. Ethicon wound closure manual; Somerville, NJ: Ethicon, Inc.; 2005. Print.
AUTHOR CORRESPONDENCE
Ramone F. Williams MD MPhil ramone.f.williams@gmail.com
