INTRODUCTION
Psoriasis impacts patients’ quality of life as much as other major chronic diseases, including cancer.1,2 Advancements in the treatment of psoriasis, particularly biologics, have allowed for better symptom control, reduction of adverse effects, and improved patient satisfaction, albeit at higher cost.3 Biologic therapies have increased the ability of psoriasis patients to achieve complete skin clearance.5 However, some patients may fail to respond to their biologic agent, and most do not achieve complete clearance.4,11-14 Complete psoriasis clearing is desirable as complete clearance is associated with fewer symptoms and better quality of life compared to less than complete psoriasis clearing.5
There is no clear consensus about how to treat patients who fail to achieve complete clearing with a biologic. Treatment approaches include adding a topical agent, escalating the dose of biologic, or switching to a different biologic. We characterized the different treatment approaches for patients with psoriasis who improve but do not clear with their biologic treatment; we assessed efficacy, cost, and safety of each treatment approach using a model informed by the available literature.
There is no clear consensus about how to treat patients who fail to achieve complete clearing with a biologic. Treatment approaches include adding a topical agent, escalating the dose of biologic, or switching to a different biologic. We characterized the different treatment approaches for patients with psoriasis who improve but do not clear with their biologic treatment; we assessed efficacy, cost, and safety of each treatment approach using a model informed by the available literature.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE to find articles discussing treatment approaches for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients who fail to achieve complete skin clearance on their biologic. Articles describing total psoriasis clearance, defined as 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) and/or Physician’s Global Assessment score of 0 (PGA 0), were considered. We then characterized the efficacy, cost, and safety of each approach to manage residual psoriasis in patients who failed to achieve complete psoriasis clearing on their biologic.
Efficacy
Efficacy for adding a topical agent as an adjunct was obtained from a published report.17 We did not identify a similar report describing the efficacy of escalating the dose of a biologic in psoriasis subjects who previously failed to achieve complete skin clearance. However, since 18.6% of psoriasis subjects receiving ustekinumab 45 mg were able to achieve PASI 100 and 29.5% of psoriasis subjects were able to achieve PASI 100 on 90 mg of ustekinumab, we estimated that an additional 10.9% of psoriasis subjects would achieve PASI 100 on ustekinumab 90
Efficacy
Efficacy for adding a topical agent as an adjunct was obtained from a published report.17 We did not identify a similar report describing the efficacy of escalating the dose of a biologic in psoriasis subjects who previously failed to achieve complete skin clearance. However, since 18.6% of psoriasis subjects receiving ustekinumab 45 mg were able to achieve PASI 100 and 29.5% of psoriasis subjects were able to achieve PASI 100 on 90 mg of ustekinumab, we estimated that an additional 10.9% of psoriasis subjects would achieve PASI 100 on ustekinumab 90