Effect of a Blueberry-Derived Antioxidant Matrix on Infrared-A Induced Gene Expression in Human Dermal Fibroblasts

August 2017 | Volume 16 | Issue 8 | Supplement Individual Articles | 125 | Copyright © August 2017


Susanne Grether-Beck PhD,a Jean Krutmann MD,a Katherine Wilkens MPAP,b and Kasey D’Amato MPAPb

aIUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany bAirelle Skincare, LLC, Los Angeles, CA

Table1Infinite 200, Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany) at 540 nm. Viability was calculated as percentage of control cells. Those cells were only exposed to cell culture medium and set to 100%.4In-vitro IrradiationPrimary human dermal fibroblasts were exposed to a dose of 360 J/cm2 infrared A radiation which previously was found to be optimal to induce gene expression without affecting viability in this cell type.1 In brief, medium was replaced by PBS, lids were removed, and cells were exposed to infrared A radiation using a Hydrosun 500H IRA device (Hydrosun Medizintechnik GmbH, Mu?llheim, Germany). The IRA device was water-filtered and equipped with a black filter and emits wavelengths between 760 and 1400nm leading to an irradiance of 360 mW/cm2 at a distance of 20 cm measured through a Hydrosun HBM1 irradiance measuring device (Hydrosun Medizintechnik GmbH, Mu?llheim, Germany). The culture dishes were placed on a cooled plate connected to a thermostated bath (Thermo Haake GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) to maintain temperatures below 37°C during irradiation. Control cells were held on a 37°C thermostated plate under similar conditions without irradiation.Application of Antioxidant MatrixCells were starved for 24 hours prior to irradiation (0% FCS) and the antioxidant matrix was added into the culture medium for 24 hours. Before starvation, before irradiation and before harvest, cells were washed once in PBS. During irradiation, the antioxidant matrix was not present (PBS incubation). After irradiation, the antioxidant matrix was added again by using a pipette to fresh media containing 2% FCS and was present until harvest of cells 24 hours post IRA treatment. The following 3 concentrations (Table 1) of the antioxidant matrix have been assessed based on the observations made during MTT assay (see Figure 1).RNA Isolation and PCRTotal RNA was performed as described above.2 For isolation of total RNA, we used RNeasy Total RNA Kits (Qiagen, Hilden; Germany). The RNA concentration was determined via photometric measurement at 260/280 (Biophotometer, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Aliquots of total RNA (100 ng) were applied for cDNA-Synthesis using SuperscriptIII First-Strand synthesis system for the reverse transcription step with random healersFigure1D’Amato(Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). A specific primer pair was designed for each gene by Primer Express 2.0 software (Applied Bio systems, Darmstadt, Germany) based on the cDNA sequence published as indicated (Table 2).Automated pipetting was performed by means of an epMotion 5070 system (Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany). The PCR reactions were carried out on a CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) using Absolute QPCR SYBR Green Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). Three samples for each condition were processed with 2 determinations, each employing the universal protocol over 46 cycles, and the mean value of these was calculated. In detail, 15 minutes 94° C activation of hot start Taq Polymerase, 20 seconds 95° C denaturation, 20 seconds 55° C annealing, and 20 seconds 72° C extension. For comparison of relative expression in real time, PCR expression observed in untreated samples was arbitrarily set equal to 1 and the corresponding changes were calculated based on the 2 (-ΔΔC(T)) method.3StatisticsThe one-way analysis of variance on ranks SNK was used as a non-parametric test for comparison of differences between measurements and P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant in case of viability testing. ANOVA SNK was performed, if data passed normality and equal variance check, and P values of less than 0.01 were considered statistically significant (SigmaPlot 12.5).Table2