Challenges, Considerations, and Strategies in Hand Rejuvenation

July 2016 | Volume 15 | Issue 7 | Original Article | 809 | Copyright © July 2016


Ramin Fathi MD1 and Joel L. Cohen MD FAAD1,2,3

1Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO
2AboutSkin Dermatology and Derm Surgery, Greenwood Village, CO
3Department of Dermatology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA

table 4
Restylane, Belotero, and Juvederm.12 Streptococcus species of bacteria generate HA. All three of these families of HA products available for use in the US are approved for facial soft tissue augmentation specific indications and not for hand rejuvenation. It is known that HA, in general, binds and retains water and can thereby increase turgor and tissue volume. HA is also thought to stimulate collagen production.20,21 Although hyaluronic acid is biodegradable, crosslinking of HA improves its durability. A distinct advantage of HA is that imperfections or undesired product can usually be reversed in the short term using hyaluronidase enzyme.19 There are two commercially available formulations of hyaluronidase, including Vitrase (ovine derived and requires skin testing) and Hylenex (human derived and does not require any skin testing).
Man et al compared HA versus human collagen. While this human collagen (Cosmoplast), which is no longer available,19 was better tolerated overall with regards to adverse effects, patient satisfaction was higher with hyaluronic acid. Additionally, blinded independent board-certified investigators found the results of hyaluronic acid to be superior to human collagen injections.2
Brandt et al evaluated small gel particle HA in a prospective open- label study of 16 patients in the dorsal hand. Two weeks after treatment, vascular, tendon, bony prominence, and skin turgor were improved by 60.9%, 65.2%, 73.7%, and 26.3%, respectively. Substantial or complete global aesthetic improvement was rated in 75% of patients by investigators and in 56% by patient self-report; 81% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied.19 In this study, the authors describe a threading technique using 2-4 ml of filler into the proximal hand and subsequently massaging distally using an anti-bruising cream, with subsequent melting ice application.19
Dallara described 99 patients in Europe who received combined HA (Juvederm Ultra 3 and Juvederm Hydrate) treatment. The mean volume injected was 1.02 ml of the former HA per hand at day 0 (minimum = 0.8 ml and maximum = 1.6 ml) and 0.91 ml of the latter HA per side at day 15 (minimum = 0.5 ml and maximum = 1 ml). The mean grade at baseline, according to the hand grading scale (named the Carruthers Aging Hand Scale in the study), was 3.18 (3.20 for the left hand and 3.16 for the right hand). This decreased at day 15 to 1.97 (1.96 and 1.99 for left and right hands, respectively) and at day 30 the mean score was 1.73 (1.71 for the left hand and 1.74 for the right hand).1

Poly-L-Lactic Acid

PLLA (Sculptra) is a synthetic, biocompatible, biodegradable filler associated with a low risk of allergic reaction.22 It is thought to stimulate the production of collagen in areas of volume loss.12 The use of injectable PLLA for dorsal hand augmentation has not been evaluated or approved by the US Food Drug Administration and is considered off-label.23 Redaelli described 27 patients with an average age of 65.9 years who were treated with PLLA for augmentation of the dorsal hands.22 His study found a measurable decrease in vein tortuosity and extensor tendon visibility. For the evaluation of the results, a patient’s satisfaction score (PSS) and a physician’s satisfaction score (PhSS) was calculated from the second to the last treatment session (minimum 3, maximum 6, average 4.03 sessions per patient). A definitive (composite) graduated score (DGS) was then calculated for each patient. The DGS was the average of the PSS and PhSS (scores from 1 to 10). The PSS relevant to hands ranged from 4 to 9 (two patients scored 4 and two patients scored 9) averaging 6.59. The PhSS ranged from 4 (three patients) to 9 (two patients), averaging 6.4. In 6 patients (22.2%), the DGS was less than 5, in 14 patients (51.8%), it was 6 to 7, and in 7 patients (25.9%), it was greater than 8.22
PLLA can be reconstituted with bacteriostatic water with or without lidocaine 1%.22,23 This reconstitution is recommended to stand for at least several hours, but usually a minimum of overnight is preferred by most injectors and, specifically, a higher-volume reconstitution (with 7-10 cc’s) is preferred by most.17 Injections of reconstituted PLLA are most frequently performed with a 25-27 gauge needle at an angle of 30-40 degrees into the deep dermis. Some physicians advocate aspirating back on the syringe to try to ensure that the needle (or cannula) is not in a vessel. Placement of subcutaneous aliquots of 0.1-0.2 ml per site is commonplace. Use of