100 and 125 U treatment was 80.0%, 88.8%, 90.0% and 95.1%, respectively, versus 2.6% with placebo (P<0.001; Figure 1). '
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
Figure 2A shows the ILA responder rate at all post-treatment visits for subjects scoring 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at maximum frown. Respective day 2 responder rates with ABO 50, 75, 100, and 125 U were 41.3%, 46.3%, 56.3%, and 53.1%, versus 5.1% with placebo (P<0.001). Week 4 ABO responder rates with ABO 50, 75, 100, and 125 U were 92.5%, 96.3%, 97.5%, and 100%, respectively, versus 5.1% with placebo (P<0.001). Week 24 respective responder rates with ABO 50, 75, 100, and 125 U were 21.3%, 36.3%, 21.3%, and 32.1%, versus 2.6% with placebo (P<0.001). Respective week 36 responder rates with ABO 50, 75, 100 and 125 U were 5.0% (P=0.120), 10.0% (P=0.007), 8.8% (P=0.014), and 12.3% (P=0.001), versus 0 with placebo. Similar results were reported for SSA scale assessments (Figure 2B).
Figure 3 shows ILA responder rates for subjects achieving ≥1-grade improvement from baseline. Respective day 2