Skin of Color Representation in Clinical Trials: An Analysis of Clinicaltrials.gov From 2008-2022

March 2023 | Volume 22 | Issue 3 | 310 | Copyright © March 2023


Published online February 13, 2023

Jennifer Jacobs BSa, Jamie Lebhar BMEa, Carrie Diamond BAa, Chandler W. Rundle MDb, Christopher Stamey MDa,b

aDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
bDuke University Health System, Department of Dermatology, Durham, NC

Abstract
There is a plethora of dermatologic clinical trials; however, little is known regarding the representation of skin of color (SOC) populations. We evaluated the 15 most prevalent skin conditions in SOC patients and their representation in clinical trials over 14 years (2008-2022) to address the lack of research regarding dermatologic clinical trials and SOC inclusion. There have been 1,419 clinical trials conducted over the last 14 years regarding the 15 dermatologic conditions most commonly affecting SOC. Despite the prevalence of these conditions in SOC, Black/African American participation was greater than 50% in clinical trials for two conditions, keloids (77.9%) and seborrheic dermatitis (55.3%). Due to the disparities in inclusion, clinical trial data is difficult to extrapolate the results to SOC patients, limiting therapeutic options and potentially contributing to worse outcomes for such patients. Our study confirms that there is limited data available in clinical trials with respect to race, ethnicity, and FST. Further, it highlights how essential it is for SOC to be both adequately represented and reported in research regarding dermatologic skin conditions to ensure equality and equity in dermatologic care.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(3) doi:10.36849/JDD.7087

Citation: Jacobs J, Lebhar J, Diamond C, et al. Skin of color representation in clinical trials: An analysis of Clinicaltrials.gov From 2008-2022. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(3):310-311. doi:10.36849/JDD.7087

INTRODUCTION

The skin of color (SOC) population in the United States (US) is increasing.1 However, SOC is not well represented in dermatology textbooks, resources, or resident education.2 SOC representation in clinical trials is understudied, with only SOC subpopulations being studied in hidradenitis suppurativa and scar formation following laser surgery,3,4 and there is a lack of research assessing types of diseases investigated in clinical trials and their inclusion of SOC participants.1 We evaluated the 15 most prevalent skin conditions in patients with SOC and their representation in clinical trials over 12 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The top 15 skin conditions affecting SOC (Table 1) were used as search terms on clinicaltrials.gov. Trials conducted from 01/01/2008 to 03/01/2022 were evaluated. Only those with at least one location within the US were included. The aggregate number of trials per disease, number completed, and number with published results were recorded. Race, ethnicity, and Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) were recorded. Studies that did not report race, ethnicity, or FST were excluded. There have been 1,419 clinical trials conducted over the last 14 years regarding the 15 dermatologic conditions. For these conditions, 447 clinical trials were completed with published results, and 278 (62.2%) had specifically identified the race, ethnicity, or FST demographics. Among the 278 trials, there were a total of 84,815 participants stratified by race, 49,883 by ethnicity, and 8,219 by FST (Table 1). 69.1% of participants were White/Caucasian, compared to 16.5% African American/Black participants. This study evaluated the current landscape of SOC representation in clinical trials over the last 14 years. Our data analysis revealed that despite the prevalence of these conditions in SOC, Black/African Americans comprised greater than 50% of participants in only two conditions, keloids (77.9%) and seborrheic dermatitis (55.3%), respectively. Though prior studies evaluating diversity of participants in dermatology clinical trials reported findings of increasing racial diversity1 (herein 8 conditions had less than 20% participation of Black/African American patients in trials. Decreasing participation of White/Caucasian patients was seen with 69.1% participation, consistent with prior literature.5

RESULTS

While representation in clinical trials is multifaceted, it may reflect healthcare disparities for SOC populations, including access to care and opportunities to participate in research trials.1 Disparities in inclusion makes it difficult to extrapolate the results to SOC patients and can limit therapeutic options and contribute to worse outcomes. This study provides a reminder and catalyst for future clinical trials and research to diversify study populations and report demographic information of their respective participants.