Featured Articles

Culturally Competent Care for LGBT Patients in Dermatology Clinics

By June 25, 2020July 1st, 2020No Comments

Skin of Color Update

Featured Article

We developed an anonymous, online survey to investigate dermatology practice characteristics relevant to LGBT patients.

Read more

Culturally Competent Care for LGBT Patients in Dermatology Clinics

Alexander M. Cartron BS, Sorana Raiciulescu MS, John C. Trinidad MD MPH

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients face unique health disparities.1 Routine collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data can optimize patient-provider interactions.2 Gender-neutral bathrooms promote inclusivity for LGBT patients.3 There is limited data on the extent to which dermatology practices make use of such features to deliver culturally competent care to LGBT patients.

We developed an anonymous, online survey to investigate dermatology practice characteristics relevant to LGBT patients. IRB approval was obtained prior to distributing the survey via a listserv of board-certified dermatologists available on the American Academy of Dermatology’s website. Bivariate associations were explored using Monte Carlo estimation for the Fisher’s exact test and chi-square. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between provider demographic, practice variables, and likelihood of routine patient intake form use.

891 board-certified dermatologists received the survey link. 81 dermatologists completed the survey. Of providers surveyed, most were female (63%), heterosexual (80%), practiced in urban environments (53%), and in private practice settings (64%) (Table 1). Most practices reported seeing less than 5 transgender patients annually (54%), though 21% of practices reported seeing more than 10 transgender patients annually. 79% of practices surveyed reported making using of gender-neutral bathrooms. Of 71 respondents with knowledge of their intake forms, 15 (21%) reported routine collection of patient sexual orientation and 14 (20%) reported their forms asked about patients’ preferred gender pronouns, in addition to gender identity. Intake form administration did not vary significantly by provider sexual orientation (P=0.43) or practice setting (P=0.10). Of 13 dermatologists not using intake forms, 7/13 (54%) cited administrative burden, 2/13 (15%) reported intake forms were not in the scope of their practice, and 1/13 (7%) cited a lack of data for patient benefit.

Read Article Now
Article Cited in this Post

You May Also Like

JDD in the News: Acne Information on Instagram, CAL/BDP Cream Improves QoL

| Featured Articles, JDD Highlights, JDD Higlights, JDD in the Media, The Latest | No Comments
By Allison Sit HCP Live covered a March JDD study in its article, “Acne-Related Social Media Content Lacking Dermatologist Input.” The study, “Acne Information on Instagram: Quality of Content and…

Novel Biome-Care Technology of C. acnes subsp. defendens Demonstrates Health and Aesthetic Benefits for Facial Skin

| Featured Articles, JDD Highlights, JDD Webinars, Rosacea, The Latest, Webinars on Demand | No Comments
As one ages, changes to skin biology can result in a shift in the skin biome causing microbial imbalance (dysbiosis) and significant reductions in certain microbial populations that maintain skin…

JDD in the News: AI Perceptions, Platelet Count & Psoriasis

| Featured Articles, JDD Highlights, JDD Higlights, JDD in the Media, The Latest | No Comments
By Allison Sit Dermatology News, Dermatology Times and Practical Dermatology all wrote about the February JDD study, “Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Integration into Dermatology Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.”…

Leave a Reply