CLINICAL PRESENTATIONA 52-year-old African American female with a history of intellectual disability, hypertension, left middle cere- bral aneurysm, hyperlipidemia, and a 90-pack-per-year history of smoking presented with a large, painful, fungating, bleeding 9.0 cm x 6.5 cm tumor adherent to her occipital scalp (Figure 1, Panel A) for 4 years. Biopsy revealed a poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (Figure 1, Panel B). Computed tomography (CT) and whole body positron emission tomography (PET-CT) demonstrated invasion of the occipitalis muscle and subadjacent occipital bone (Figure 1, Panel C, arrow), along with metastatic cervical adenopathy (Figure 1, Panels D and E, arrows). The patient underwent radical excision of the tumor, including skin and underlying muscle, fascia, and periosteum, which revealed perineural and lymphovascular invasion with positive deep margins. Occipital craniectomy and bilateral posterolateral neck dissection with xenograft placement were also performed, revealing 3 metastatic lymph nodes. After reconstruction, the patient was referred to radiation oncology for adjuvant radiation treatment. Repeat CT after radiation demonstrated gross tumor recurrence in the skull and posterior upper neck vasculature, with increased invasion of the occipital bone with likely dural but no frank parenchymal invasion. Additionally, new metastatic lesions within the lungs were visualized (Figure 2, arrows). At this juncture, the patient has opted for only supportive management. DISCUSSION An estimated 700,000 cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) are diagnosed annually.6 While the overall majority of cSCCs are low-risk tumors with a favorable prognosis, a subset of tumors is considered "high-risk" cSCC (HRcSCC), demonstrating the need for a more aggressive clinical course, with a potential for local recurrence or metastasis. The annual incidence of metastasis is approximately 4%, though this is likely to be an underestimation as epidemiological analysis is hindered by the lack of a national cancer registry for cSCC.7,8 The 5-year overall survival of a patient is reduced by 50% with the presence of metastasis, making both early identi cation of this subset and prompt initiation of aggressive management of paramount importance.5 Multiple staging algorithms have been published in an attempt to help risk stratify cSCCs based on pro- posed tumor characteristics thought to predict risk of metastasis, though no official guidelines have been formally validated.8 As defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 2002, the intended purpose of cancer staging is to distinctly
Resident Rounds Part III: Case Report: Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in an African American Female
January 2017 | Volume 16 | Issue 1 | Features | 81 | Copyright © January 2017
Jennifer N. Harb MD,a Alexandra L. Owens MD,a Kathryn Mooneyham Potter MD,a Michael Montuno MD,a Reordan O. De Jesus MD,b and Sailesh Konda MDa
aDepartment of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL bDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the most common skin cancer diagnosed in African Americans.1 Twenty to forty percent of cSCCs reported in African Americans are related to chronic scarring processes or areas of in ammation.2 Risk factors for developing cSCCs in patients of color include chronic scars resulting from burns, skin ulcers, and radiation sites; and chronic inflammatory diseases such as discoid lupus and hidradenitis suppuritiva.1
Although skin cancer only accounts for 1% to 2% of cancers diagnosed within African Americans, it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in this population.1,3 Significant delays in diagnosis and treatment are largely thought to be responsible for this prognostic incongruity. The rate of metastasis in patients of color is 31%, compared with only 4% in Caucasians.4,5 Early recognition by physicians and increased awareness resulting in preventative measures by patients may decrease this noted disparity.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;16(1):81-84.