Psychosocial Burden of Verruca Vulgaris: A Cross-Sectional Survey

June 2022 | Volume 21 | Issue 6 | 614 | Copyright © June 2022


Published online May 18, 2022

doi:10.36849/JDD.6773

Nagasai C. Adusumilli MBAa, Ezra Shoen MDb, Adam J. Friedman MDc

aThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
bIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
cDepartment of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC

Abstract
Although medically benign, common warts, or verruca vulgaris, may negatively affect emotional wellbeing and quality of life (QoL). The various treatment options, such as liquid nitrogen cryotherapy or Candida antigen injection, can be painful, and repeat trials for wart resolution can be burdensome. Because the psychosocial burden of verruca is likely underestimated, we surveyed adult patients diagnosed and treated with warts at a single academic institution in an urban setting to assess the reported effects on QoL and satisfaction with the different treatment modalities. In domains such as anxiety, social activities, and interpersonal relationships, patients rated impact of warts on a scale of 1-100, with a score of 1 representing “minimal impact” and 100 representing “severe impact.” These numerical ratings were then converted to the validated Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) parameters for consistency with other QoL studies. Our results indicate that patients are “A little” self-conscious or embarrassed by their warts and that their warts caused “A little” anxiety. Although patients reported more discomfort with Candida antigen than with cryotherapy, overall patient satisfaction for the two procedures was identical. Notably, 52% of respondents endorsed attempting home remedies before seeking clinical care, suggesting room for improvement in patient education for initiating dermatologic care. Future studies should examine patients with recalcitrant verruca and patient satisfaction with other management options.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(6):614-617. doi:10.36849/JDD.6773

INTRODUCTION

Verruca vulgaris, caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the epidermis, is a highly prevalent dermatologic condition, particularly in children and young adults.1 Clonal proliferation of infected keratinocytes leads to the epidermal thickening and hyperkeratinization characteristic of cutaneous warts. Hundreds of genotypically distinct strains have been identified. HPV types 16 and 18 are highly associated with cervical and penile squamous cell carcinoma.2 HPV types 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 27 are associated with the majority of common warts with no cancer risk, with infections typically transmitted via skin-to-skin or environmental contact. Although common warts are medically benign, commonly afflicted areas, such as the extremities, are visibly exposed, driving patients to seek treatment.

Investigations into the effects on quality of life (QoL) have focused on anogenital warts and common warts in the pediatric population.1,3,4 However, patients can first experience or re-experience common warts in adulthood, and the associated psychosocial burden is likely underestimated. Visible skin burden and the stigma of a contagious condition may affect self-esteem, social interactions, and overall emotional wellbeing. Furthermore, the treatment options can be burdensome and painful, leading to frustration with repeated treatments and recurrences. Outcomes from various options vary significantly among patients due to the site of involvement or immune status.5 Patient satisfaction with common wart treatments, another plausible variable influencing QoL, has not been explored. This survey study aimed to assess the reported effects on QoL in adults diagnosed with and treated for verruca vulgaris and their satisfaction with the different therapeutic modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We sampled patients at least 18 years of age who were diagnosed with and treated for verruca between 2015 and 2018 at the Medical Faculty Associates (MFA) of George Washington University Hospital for this single-center, cross-sectional survey. This study was IRB-approved with informed consent (NCR202169). Basic demographic information was collected, including patient sex, age range (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-64, 65+), and ethnicity (Table 1). The survey focused on effects on QoL stemming from symptoms (Table 2) and on patient satisfaction with attempted treatment options (Table 3). Each patient rated the perceived impact of the wart(s) on respective QoL measures between 1-100, with 1 representing “minimal impact” and 100 representing “severe impact.” These