Pentoxifylline as a Steroid-Sparing Agent in Granuloma Annulare: A Rural Retrospective Study

February 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 2 | 154 | Copyright © February 2026


Published online January 31, 2026

William Snider BSa, Taylor Fleshman MDb, Rebecca Hicks BAa, Leah Hahn MDa, Ian Depew BSa, Shane Cook MDc

aMarshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV
bMarshall University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntington, WV
cMarshall University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Huntington, WV

Abstract
Background: Granuloma annulare (GA) is a benign inflammatory dermatosis characterized by dermal granuloma formation. While its etiology is unclear, GA has been linked to systemic comorbidities. Localized GA typically responds to corticosteroids, but generalized GA often follows a more refractory course. Pentoxifylline has emerged as a potential steroid-sparing agent, though data are limited.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 102 patients diagnosed with GA at a single academic dermatology clinic in rural Appalachia. Demographic data, disease subtype, treatment history, and comorbidities were recorded. Comorbidity prevalence was compared with state and national averages. Statistical analysis assessed associations between disease extent, treatment response, and comorbidity burden.
Results: The cohort was 79% female with a mean age of 46 years; 19% of cases were pediatric. Generalized GA accounted for 46% of cases and showed elevated rates of type 2 diabetes (36%), hypothyroidism (26%), and autoimmune disease (15%). Patients with ≥3 comorbidities were more likely to have prolonged disease (>2 years). Generalized GA required more treatment attempts (P<0.001) and had higher failure rates than localized disease. Pentoxifylline achieved a 64% response rate in generalized GA, outperforming hydroxychloroquine and topical corticosteroids.
Conclusions: Generalized GA is more treatment-resistant and associated with a greater comorbidity burden. Pentoxifylline demonstrated favorable efficacy and may serve as a first-line systemic agent in refractory cases. Further multi-center studies are needed to validate these findings and guide evidence-based management of GA.

 

INTRODUCTION

Granuloma annulare (GA), initially identified as a "ringed eruption of the fingers," is a benign and self-limiting inflammatory skin disorder characterized by granuloma formation in the dermis.1 Its incidence is estimated at 0.04%, with a higher prevalence among women and adults over thirty years old.1 The most common form of GA is the localized variant, which typically manifests as annular erythematous plaques or papules, primarily on the dorsal surfaces of the hands or feet.2,3 Generalized GA is characterized by the presence of 10 or more widespread annular plaques and involves both the upper and lower extremities.3,4 This study focuses on the localized and generalized forms of GA, as they represent the most frequently encountered clinical variants.

The pathophysiology of GA is hypothesized to involve a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction, with CD4+ Th1-mediated macrophage activation followed by a Th2-driven cytokine response, culminating in connective tissue degradation.1 Both M1 and M2 macrophages appear upregulated in GA, supporting a biphasic mechanism of tissue breakdown and remodeling.1 While the disease is histologically characterized by necrobiotic granulomas surrounded by palisading histiocytes, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and mucin deposition, its etiology remains poorly understood.1,5 GA has been linked to systemic conditions including hyperlipidemia, autoimmune disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, though the latter association remains unclear.1,3,6

Topical and intralesional corticosteroids are considered first-line therapies, often yielding partial or complete resolution.1 For recalcitrant or generalized disease, additional agents such as phototherapy, hydroxychloroquine, pentoxifylline, and dapsone have been explored, though response rates vary considerably.1,7,8 More recently, systemic and targeted agents such as methotrexate, TNF-α inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors have shown promise in small case series.9,10,11,12 However, variability in treatment efficacy, limited high-quality data, and long disease