INTRODUCTION
Acne vulgaris is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that can lead to permanent scarring, leaving the face disfigured and negatively impacting one’s quality of life.1 Acne-related scarring has been associated with higher rates of mental distress and suicidal ideation,2 making the treatment of acne scars a priority for clinicians.
Traditional classification of atrophic acne scars includes 3 main types: (1) ice pick, (2) boxcar, and (3) rolling,1 as illustrated in Figure 1. Treatment options for acne scarring vary based on depth and extent of involvement and can include laser resurfacing, microneedling, chemical peel, dermal fillers, subcision, and punch excision, among others.1 Research is lacking on the selection of the best laser or energy-based device for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.3 This study aims to synthesize the results of clinical trials from 2018 to 2022 into an up-to-date narrative review of laser and energy-based devices for atrophic acne scars.
Traditional classification of atrophic acne scars includes 3 main types: (1) ice pick, (2) boxcar, and (3) rolling,1 as illustrated in Figure 1. Treatment options for acne scarring vary based on depth and extent of involvement and can include laser resurfacing, microneedling, chemical peel, dermal fillers, subcision, and punch excision, among others.1 Research is lacking on the selection of the best laser or energy-based device for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.3 This study aims to synthesize the results of clinical trials from 2018 to 2022 into an up-to-date narrative review of laser and energy-based devices for atrophic acne scars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A search of clinical trials published between the years 2018 to 2022 was conducted in PubMed with the following keywords, "atrophic acne scars", "acne scars", "ablative laser", "nonablative