INTRODUCTION
Hypertrophic scars, those that are raised and confined to the wound margin, and keloidal scars, those that extend beyond the wound margin, are manifestations of abnormal wound healing.1 In effort to better stratify and define the characteristics of those at risk for hypertrophic scars and keloids, we utilized a large global health research network database from 108 health care organizations (TriNetX) to quantify the associations between race, ethnicity, and comorbidities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We identified the cohort of all patients with hypertrophic scars/keloids and generated a control cohort of age, sex, and race-matched patients without those diagnoses. The ICD-10 code, L91.0, which codes both hypertrophic scars and keloids, was utilized. Despite the lack of separation with this single code, given the significant overlap in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of both entities, we believe the results of this analysis still provide a novel contribution to the literature.
RESULTS
A total of 6,249 patients, roughly 1% of the total database, with hypertrophic scars and keloids (52% female, mean [SD] age 48.1 [24.2] years) were identified (Table 1). As anticipated, higher association was identified for hypertrophic scars and keloids in Black/African American races (OR=1.74, P<0.01), while White race and Hispanic ethnicity conferred a decreased risk (OR=0.71, P<0.01), (OR= 1.06, P>0.05), respectively (Table 1). The highest associated risk factors included history of scarring alopecia (OR=3.64), rosacea (OR=3.50), atopic dermatitis (OR=3.47), and acne (OR=3.42) (all P<0.01) (Table 2).
![](https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dl.jddonline.com/articleimages/24_2_8401+BIRDA/Insights-Into-Demographics%2C-Comorbidities%2C-and-Risk-Factors-in-Keloids-and-Hypertrophic-Scars--A-Retrospective-StudyT1.png)
![](https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/dl.jddonline.com/articleimages/24_2_8401+BIRDA/Insights-Into-Demographics%2C-Comorbidities%2C-and-Risk-Factors-in-Keloids-and-Hypertrophic-Scars--A-Retrospective-StudyT2.png)
DISCUSSION
While distinct in their definition, histologic morphology, and cellular basis for development, hypertrophic scars and keloids both represent excessive dermal fibrosis and cutaneous scarring. The higher incidence in Black/African American individuals is also supported in our study, the pathogenesis of which remains undetermined and speculatively related to melanocyte stimulation of growth and proliferation of fibroblasts and extracellular matrix processes.1,2 Due to inadequate sample size, however, analysis related to vitiligo patients was constrained.
The high correlation with inflammatory conditions such atopic dermatitis, acne, rosacea, and hypertrophic scars/keloids may be attributed to common cytokine pathways, specifically the overactivity of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13). These cytokines are instrumental to the inflammatory response, subsequent fibroblast activation, and eventual keloid pathology. This insight has led to targeted therapeutic strategies, such as dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4 and ILTABLE 13, offering a novel approach to potentially reduce or prevent keloid formation in individuals with these conditions.3-5 Interestingly, scarring alopecia revealed the highest association with hypertrophic scars and keloids, with many cicatricial presentations, including dissecting cellulitis and acne keloidalis nuchae, commonly presenting with thickened scarred nodules. The observed association between hypertrophic scars/keloids and skin cancers (OR = 2.86, P<0.01) and may stem from prolonged cytokine infiltration, with common elevation of factors such as nuclear factor-kappa B and transforming growth factor-β.6 It is also possible that this relation could be related to necessary surgical treatments leading to abnormal scarring. Limitations of this study include the retrospective nature of data collection, the potential for misclassification of diagnoses using ICD-10 codes, and the small sample sizes of certain comorbidities.
DISCLOSURES
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- Chike-Obi CJ, Cole PD, Brissett AE. Keloids: pathogenesis, clinical features, and management. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(3):178-184. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1224797.Â
- Gao FL, Jin R, Zhang L, et al. The contribution of melanocytes to pathological scar formation during wound healing. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(7):609-613.Â
- Shi C, Zhu J, Yang D. The pivotal role of inflammation in scar/keloid formation after acne. Dermatoendocrinol. 2018;9(1).doi:10.1080/19381980.2018.14483 27.Â
- Zhang X, Wu X, Li D. The communication from immune cells to the fibroblasts in keloids: Implications for immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15475. doi:10.3390/ijms242015475.Â
- Wong AJS, Song EJ. Dupilumab as an adjuvant treatment for keloid-associated symptoms. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;13:73-74. doi:10.1016/j. jdcr.2021.04.034.Â
- Lu YY, Tu HP, Wu CH, et al. Risk of cancer development in patients with keloids. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9390. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88789-1.Â
AUTHOR CORRESPONDENCE
Ajay Nair Sharma MD MBA ajayns@uci.edu