INTRODUCTION
Plaque psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the
skin affecting approximately 2% of the US population.1
The physical signs of plaque psoriasis (erythema, scaling,
dryness, pigmentary changes, and plaque elevation) and
associated symptoms (pruritus, burning, tenderness, and pain)
can profoundly affect quality of life (QOL). Physical and
mental functioning in these subjects is comparable with those
afflicted with other serious ailments, including depression, heart
disease, and cancer.2 No cure for psoriasis exists. Treatment
relies on management of the disease utilizing topical therapies,
traditional systemic agents, and biologic drugs.
Clobetasol propionate is a superpotent topical corticosteroid
indicated for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. It is generally
well tolerated and is available in several formulations,
including a spray.3-6 Clobetasol propionate 0.05% spray (CPS)
was an effective treatment for plaque psoriasis in clinical trials
comprising more than 2,200 subjects.7 In these trials, treatment
was successful (clear or almost clear in the overall disease
severity [ODS] scale or in the target plaque severity scale) in
more than 78% of subjects at the end of the 4-week treatment
period.3-6 Quality of life, as measured by the PQOL-12 psoriasis
QOL portion of the Koo-Menter Psoriasis Instrument and the
Dermatology Life Quality Index, also improved in subjects
treated with CPS.6,8,9 Because of the risk of adverse events
with prolonged use, super-high-potent topical corticosteroid agents are usually limited to 2-week treatment periods. These
studies, however, demonstrated that CPS is safe and effective
over a 4-week period, with most patients treated with CPS
achieving excellent results after just 2 weeks.3-6
In 2 pivotal trials that established the efficacy and tolerability
of CPS in plaque psoriasis, measurements of efficacy were
dichotomized into success or failure, and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) analysis was used to compare treatment
success between the treatment groups.4,10 Significant success in
treatment (clear or almost clear) was achieved in ODS in the
CPS group in both studies compared with the vehicle group
after 2 weeks, but not after 1 week. Reexamination of the distribution
of scores at week 1 revealed a shift toward more
rapid improvement in the CPS groups. This raised the question
whether dichotomizing the scores into success or failure rates
had masked improvements in the distribution of scores that
were otherwise lost. In fact, dichotomizing scores into success
or failure and analyzing using the CMH test masks more
gradual improvements in the distribution of scores not
categorized as success. Subjects who did not achieve success
in ODS by week 1 may have demonstrated significant improvements
in ODS and in individual sign/symptom scores (erythema,
plaque elevation, scaling, and pruritus) from baseline. Thus, the
CMH test may not be the most appropriate analytic tool if the
percentages of success are near 0% or 100%.11