Error: 500: HTTP/2 500 Evaluating Topical Nitric Oxide Formulations Against an Atopic Dermatitis Methicillin-Resistant S. Aureus Isolate in a Porcine Infection Model - JDDonline - Journal of Drugs in Dermatology

Evaluating Topical Nitric Oxide Formulations Against an Atopic Dermatitis Methicillin-Resistant S. Aureus Isolate in a Porcine Infection Model

October 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 10 | 8830 | Copyright © October 2025


Published online September 30, 2025

Stephen C. Davis BS, Joel Gil BS, Michael Solis MBA, Ryan Strong BS, Roger Cassagnol BS

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Dr. Philip Frost Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, Miami, FL

Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin disorder characterized by reduced skin barrier function, which often leads to recurring infections, predominantly by Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus, that exacerbate disease severity. Managing these infections is made challenging by antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation. Nitric oxide (NO) has emerged as a promising antimicrobial treatment that can disperse biofilm and may provide an alternative treatment for AD infections.
Methods: This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of 3 topical NO-releasing formulations at various concentrations against established MRSA infections, from an AD-derived isolate, in a porcine wound infection model. Partial thickness wounds were inoculated and, after 48 hours of biofilm formation, were treated daily with NO formulations or vehicle control, or left untreated. Wounds were recovered for baseline, day 4, or day 7 bacterial enumeration.
Results: All tested NO-releasing formulations substantially reduced MRSA burden compared with baseline counts, and most effectively with the highest concentrations. 20% NO+GEL resulted in a significant reduction of 99.23% compared with baseline at day 7. The 16% NO+UNG treatment, compared with the untreated control, had bacterial reductions on day 4 and day 7 of greater than 99.5%. The greatest reduction of 99.97% (>3 Log CFU/mL) was observed for 6% NO+CREAM compared with the untreated control group at day 7.
Conclusions: NO-releasing treatments have considerable efficacy against MRSA infections and biofilm. These findings support the potential of NO as an antimicrobial treatment for AD patients, and further evaluation should be conducted to assess clinical efficacy.

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD), or atopic eczema, is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disorder. It affects a substantial portion of the population, with prevalence up to 10% in adults and up to 20% in children.1,2 AD is characterized by itching, dry skin, and impaired skin barrier function.3 Most of these conditions are worsened by skin infections, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The prevalence of MRSA infections among AD patients ranges from 13% to as high as 25%, while this range is 1% to 3% among the general population.4,5

The elevated colonization rate is attributable to a combination of factors related to AD. These include impaired skin barrier function, decreased antimicrobial peptides, microbiome imbalance, reduced levels of filaggrin and its degradation products, increased skin pH, overexpression of Th2/Th17 cytokines, and changes in lipid composition.6 Further, MRSA infections are in turn associated with increased disease severity, demonstrated by higher Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) scores in AD patients with these infections.4 These pathogens produce virulence factors, which are associated with increased inflammation and further disruption of skin barrier function.6

Current treatment approaches for MRSA infections in AD patients include topical or oral antibiotics.8 In a study evaluating various antibiotics against S. aureus and MRSA isolated from AD patients, there was concern regarding the increasing resistance of these pathogens to current antibiotic therapies, with the authors suggesting more cautious use and reduced treatment periods. Notably, AD-derived S. aureus isolates had marked increases in resistance to therapies currently used for AD patients, such as mupirocin and fusidic acid.7 Additionally, S. aureus infections are often recurrent among AD patients, which can necessitate the use of decolonization approaches such as bleach baths to attempt to reduce the pathogen burden, but the demonstrated efficacy of this approach remains limited.8 In previous studies, results showed that bleach baths may offer benefits only in the reduction of AD severity without reducing S. aureus colonization.9