INTRODUCTION
The lips are one part of an aesthetic unit that includes the teeth, gingiva, and bone structure of the face and contribute significantly to the overall impression of personal beauty.1-3 Specifically, fullness and delineation of the lips are associated with attractiveness, sensuality, and youth.2,4,5
Lip augmentation to correct volume deficits in the upper and/or lower lip has gained popularity, becoming a standard clinical procedure. Younger patients seeking lip augmentation may wish to add proportion and/or volume, while older patients may seek to reverse the lips' natural aging.6 Aging of the lips, attributed to breakdown of collagen support structures, is characterized by thinning of the upper and/or lower lip bodies; loss of delineated margins, projection, and color in the lips; lengthening of the upper lip; hanging or drooping corners of the mouth; and formation of the labiomental crease and wrinkles.5,7-10 Additional factors can intensify the changes associated with natural aging, including lifestyle, diet, genetics, smoking, stress, and exposure to the sun and pollution.1,5,9,11
Several noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques are available to increase lip volume and thickness, as well as correct surrounding wrinkles. Volume correction can be performed surgically via silicone implants, for example, or non-surgically. Among the available non-surgical procedures, dermal fillers are widely used and are highly suitable for lip augmentation and improvement of perioral wrinkles and lip contouring.5,12-14
Rising use of aesthetic facial fillers has driven the need for modern photonumeric scales to assess treatment response objectively and reproducibly by demonstrating aesthetic improvement from baseline. Concurrently, regulatory agencies have pressed for more robust validation measures of new aesthetic scales and established that these scales are fit-for-purpose in various clinical settings. Numerous facial-aging scales have been developed and validated over the past several years,15-27 and recent meta-analyses have compared over 100 such scales.28,29