A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face, Double-Blind Study Comparing Topical Malassezin to Hydroquinone 4% for Melasma

January 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 1 | 25 | Copyright © January 2026


Published online December 27, 2025

Pearl E. Grimes MDa, Shanaya Dias BSa, Nicole Chizara Oparaugo MD MBAa, Tatiana Tatarinova PhDb, Tim McCraw PhDc

aVitiligo & Pigmentation Institute of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
bComputational Biology, University of La Verne, La Verne, CA
cSkin Science Advisors LLC, Pacolet, SC

Abstract
Background: Previous studies have documented the capacity of malassezin to brighten the skin. It represents a novel agent for the treatment of hyperpigmentation.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of a topical 0.75% malassezin formulation to 4% hydroquinone, the gold standard for treating melasma.
Methods: A randomized, controlled, split-face, double-blind study was conducted in 20 adult female subjects with symmetrical mild-to-moderate melasma. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to determine the allotted side of the face treated twice per day with malassezin or hydroquinone for 12 weeks. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring brightening effects, global improvement, split-face Melasma Area Severity Index (hemi-MASI) scores, colorimetry measurements, and photography.
Results: Twenty subjects completed the study. Compared to baseline, both malassezin and hydroquinone-treated facial areas showed significant efficacy at 12 weeks in brightening (1.85 and 1.95, P=0.027 and 0.008); global improvement (2.2 and 2.3, P=0.004 and 0.001); and hemi-MASI reduction (2.49 and 2.33; P<0.001 and P<0.001), respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences when comparing the malassezin-treated side to the hydroquinone-treated side at each visit. Side effects in both groups were mild throughout the study.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that malassezin shows comparable efficacy to the gold standard, hydroquinone. Our results further support malassezin as a promising new treatment for patients with melasma.

 

INTRODUCTION

Melasma is a chronic condition characterized by often symmetrical areas of hyperpigmentation affecting the cheeks, nose, chin, and forehead. Genetics, hormonal influences, ultraviolet, and visible light exposure are significant contributing factors for melasma.1–3 It is most common in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin type III–V. Current data suggest that melasma represents a phenotype of photodamage.3 The negative impact on quality of life can be substantial, as affected individuals frequently experience low self-esteem and depression.4,5 Despite advancements in dermatological treatments, melasma remains therapeutically challenging due to its complex pathophysiology and universal relapses to available therapies.2,3

The current therapeutic landscape for melasma involves a multimodal approach.6,7 Photoprotective agents, antioxidants, chemical exfoliants, and resurfacing procedures are often combined to achieve optimal results. Skin-lightening agents, such as hydroquinone, kojic acid, azelaic acid, vitamin C, and retinoids, are commonly used in clinical practice.6,8 Hydroquinone, in particular, has been considered the gold standard for treating melasma.9,10 However, these agents are not universally effective. Long-term use of hydroquinone can lead to adverse effects, including skin irritation, rebound hyperpigmentation, and ochronosis in rare cases.10 These limitations underscore the pressing need for new, safe, and efficacious topical therapies to address the global burden of facial hyperpigmentation.