Disparities in Hidradentitis Suppurativa Clinical Trials: An Updated Review of ClinicalTrials.gov from 2020 to 2024

December 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 12 | 9066 | Copyright © December 2025


Published online November 25, 2025

Janet Choi BSa, Richard Rookwood BSa, Isabel Yoon BSb, Kristina Campton MDc, Kseniya Kobets MD MHSa

aAlbert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Bronx, NY
bPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
cHudson Dermatology, Tarrytown, NY

Abstract
Background: There is a notable lack of diversity in dermatologic studies, even concerning conditions that are known to have a higher prevalence in the skin of color (SOC) population, such as hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This study updates the current literature on SOC representation in dermatology by analyzing the demographics and locations of HS clinical trials from 2020 to 2024, during which there were significant advancements in therapeutics.
Methods: A search of the term "hidradenitis suppurativa" was conducted on the ClinicalTrials.gov website for trials initiated between June 2020 and December 2024.
Results: Five clinical trials totaling 411 participants were included. Caucasian/White participants (n=281, 68.4%) comprised the majority, followed by African American/Black (n=93, 22.6%) participants. In comparison to HS trials from 2008 to 2020, the 5 recent trials between 2020 and 2024 demonstrated a significant (P<0.001) increase (14.9% vs 22.6%, respectively) in the percentage of Black participants. Most US clinical trial sites (n=38, 59.3%) were located in cities with moderate (12.6-49.9%) to high (>50%) Black populations.
Conclusions: The increase in the proportion of Black participants in HS clinical trials from 2008-2020 to 2020-2024 demonstrates a promising outlook for improved representation in HS clinical trials. Nonetheless, an underrepresentation of Black participants in HS clinical trials continues to persist, highlighting the necessity for continued efforts in the inclusion of SOC individuals in clinical research.

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease characterized by debilitating symptoms associated with the highest comorbidity burden and lowest quality of life among dermatologic conditions.1 HS largely affects the African American (AA)/Black population, with epidemiology studies demonstrating the highest prevalence in Black populations.2 In the United States (US), Black patients with HS have been shown to have a higher disease burden, manifesting as higher disease severity, healthcare utilization, and number of surgeries compared to other racial groups.3 Despite this, there are notable disparities in the enrollment of Black participants in HS clinical trials. A study by Okeke et al. analyzing demographics of HS trials from 2008 to 2020 found that Black participants made up a minority (14.9%) of the participants.4 Since 2020, significant therapeutic advancements, notably FDA approvals of secukinumab, an interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitor, and bimekizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A and IL-17F, have emerged.5,6 This study updates the current literature on Black patient representation in HS clinical trials with the advent of multiple biologic therapies and explores possible barriers to inclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search for "hidradenitis suppurativa" was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials with a start date between June 1, 2020, and December 1, 2024. Trials were included if they reported at least one of the following: race, ethnicity, or Fitzpatrick skin type (FST), and if they had at least one US location. In total, 5 trials were included. Trials were excluded if they lacked sufficient demographic data or if they were ongoing.

Patient characteristics (sex, race, ethnicity, Hurley stage) and trial characteristics (intervention type, phase, location) were collected from each trial. Data was retrieved using both ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed by utilizing the NCT number, trial title, or authors' names to locate the corresponding articles. Black population densities at trial sites were categorized as "very low" (0.0-0.9% of population), "low" (1-12.5%), "moderate" (12.6-49.9%), or "high" (>50%) as defined by Okeke et al.4 Race categories