Cosmetic Procedures for Treating Lichen Planus Pigmentosus: A Review

February 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 2 | 148 | Copyright © February 2026


Published online February 3, 2026

doi:10.36849/JDD.9209

Udokama Ezekwe BSa, Grace Ugwueke BSb, Christine Olagun-Samuel BAc, Lisa Akintilo MD MPHc, Nkem Ugonabo MDd, Prince Adotama MDc

aLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
bMeharry Medical College, Nashville, TN
cRonald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
dAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, New York, NY

Abstract
Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) is a rare pigmentary disorder primarily affecting patients with skin of color. Currently, comprehensive evaluations for procedural interventions for LPP are limited in the literature. In this review, we assess current procedural options for LPP treatment, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and practical considerations. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed and Embase identified English studies published through December 2024 that examined cosmetic procedures for the treatment of LPP. Keywords included “lichen planus pigmentosus,” “laser,” “chemical peel,” “glycolic acid,” “salicylic acid,” “TCA,” “jessner,” “VI,” “cosmetic procedure,” “procedure”, and related terms. Articles without original data, sufficient results, or human participants were excluded. Data on study design, participant characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were extracted and reported in this descriptive review. A total of 16 studies were reviewed, which highlighted procedural approaches to managing LPP, including chemical peels (eg, phenol and glycolic acid), laser therapy (eg, Q-switched Nd:YAG, CO2 fractional, Picosecond Nd:YAG, erbium-doped fiber), and platelet-rich plasma therapy. Evidence was limited by small sample sizes, lack of randomized controlled trials, and reliance on case reports and series. Most studies included fewer than 20 participants, limiting the generalizability of findings. In conclusion, procedural interventions can serve as an alternative treatment option for LPP, especially for those unresponsive to standard treatments. Further research with larger cohorts and comparative trials are needed to further elucidate current findings.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2026;25(2): doi:10.36849/JDD.9209

INTRODUCTION

Lichen planus pigmentosus (LPP) is a rare variant of lichen planus (LP) characterized by persistent dark brown, black, or slate gray coalescing macules primarily affecting sun-exposed areas, including the face, neck, and upper extremities.1,2 This condition was first recognized and reported in India.3 However, since its discovery, it has been reported in various other ethnicities with diverse skin types, including patients of Southeast Asian, Hispanic, and African descent.4 The exact etiology of LPP remains unclear; however, it has been associated with ultraviolet radiation, hepatitis C infection, environmental pollution, and the topical application of mustard oil, henna, and hair dyes, particularly in India.5

LPP patients often experience significant psychosocial distress due to the cosmetic impact of the condition, further compounded by its refractory response to most treatment modalities.6 Existing studies on treatment for LPP primarily focus on non-procedural therapies such as topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and systemic treatments. While these treatment strategies may potentially be effective in stabilizing the disease and preventing further progression, the residual pigmentation caused by pigment incontinence in the dermis is often resistant to conventional treatments.7,8

Cosmetic procedures are increasingly being used for pigmentary disorders, offering a promising alternative for LPP management.9-11 Techniques such as laser therapy, chemical peels, and platelet-rich plasma have been used for the reduction of excess pigmentation in LPP patients.4,8 However, existing literature on their application in LPP remains limited. This review aims to evaluate current procedural options for LPP treatment, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and practical considerations. By providing a comprehensive analysis of these treatment modalities, this paper seeks to guide dermatologists in optimizing care for patients with LPP and highlight areas for future research.