Comparing Adherence, Side Effects, and Satisfaction in Oral and Topical Minoxidil: A Cross-Sectional Study

February 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 2 | 131 | Copyright © February 2025


Published online January 21, 2025

doi:10.36849/JDD.8424

Sonja Kobayashi BSa, Lucy Rose MAa, Abena Minta BSa, Stephanie Trovato MDb, Brittany Dulmage MDb

aThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
bThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Columbus, OH

Abstract
Hair loss disorders negatively impact quality of life. Topical and oral minoxidil are hair loss therapeutics that require daily use to achieve sustained benefits. Patients on topical minoxidil often report aesthetic and discomfort concerns (eg, greasy hair), which may limit adherence. Oral minoxidil is not FDA-approved for alopecia and carries a higher risk of systemic side effects. Efficacy between the 2 is similar. However, the impact of the route of administration on patient adherence and satisfaction remains unclear. Our study investigates whether topical or oral minoxidil yields greater adherence and satisfaction while comparing side effects. A survey was distributed to patients on minoxidil (n=50, response rate 98.0%) to assess ease of treatment, adherence, satisfaction, and side effects. Patients on oral minoxidil reported greater ease of treatment (P=0.0004) and styling their hair on treatment (P=0.0112). Fewer patients on oral minoxidil stopped treatment due to difficulty of use (0% vs 18.8%, P=0.0076). Oral patients missed less treatment days (x=0.15 vs x=1.2, P=0.0022) and reported greater satisfaction in hair volume (P=0.0098) and change of hair (P=0.0159). Side effects were similar, except for a higher incidence of hypertrichosis among patients on oral minoxidil (48.5% vs 6.25%, P=0.0015). These findings suggest that oral minoxidil is superior to topical in terms of ease of use, adherence, and satisfaction without increasing systemic side effects. By circumventing scalp application, oral minoxidil reduces the treatment burden and avoids the aesthetic and discomfort complaints that limit adherence. When establishing treatment plans, physicians should consider patient experience and its impact on adherence.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(2):131-133. doi:10.36849/JDD.8424

INTRODUCTION

Hair loss disorders are a heterogenous group that negatively impacts self-confidence and quality of life.1 Topical minoxidil is a widely used therapeutic approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. Although oral minoxidil is not FDA-approved for hair loss, it is commonly prescribed as a safe alternative to the topical preparation.2 Patients on topical minoxidil frequently report aesthetic and discomfort concerns, which may limit adherence. Oral minoxidil, however, carries a higher potential risk of systemic side effects.2 Importantly, both topical and oral minoxidil necessitate daily and consistent use to achieve sustained hair density improvements.2 Previous studies demonstrate similar efficacy between the two but failed to consider how the route of administration impacts patient adherence and satisfaction.3 The current study investigates whether topical or oral minoxidil yields greater adherence and satisfaction while comparing side effects.

A survey was administered to 50 hair loss patients on minoxidil at 2 Ohio State University Dermatology Clinics from June 2023 to December 2023 (response rate 98.0%). Thirty-three patients were on oral minoxidil (1.25 mg to 2.5 mg/d), and 16 patients were on topical minoxidil (2% to 5% foam or solution). One survey was excluded because the patient had used both oral and topical minoxidil. As shown in Table 1, reported patient characteristics included age, sex, race, hair loss diagnosis, form of treatment, duration of hair loss, and duration of treatment. Conditions studied included endocrine therapy-induced alopecia, androgenetic alopecia, chemotherapy-induced alopecia, telogen effluvium, frontal fibrosing alopecia/lichen planopilaris, central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, and alopecia areata. The survey assessed ease of treatment, adherence, satisfaction, and side effects. Responses are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. Statistical analysis was completed on JMP Pro 17 Software using Chi-Square Likelihood Ratios and Nominal Linear Regression Models.