Speed of Response in Biologic Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

August 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 8 | 10111 | Copyright © August 2026


Published online July 20, 2026

M Zaid Shami MDa, Shivkar Amara MDb, Stephanie V. Shimon MDa, Isabella Kest BSc, Rahib K. Islam BSd, Luciano Moffatt PhDe, Mark Lebwohl MDf

aHCA Aventura Hospital and Medical Center, Miami, FL
bNorthwell Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Queens, NY
cAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
dLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
eInstituto de Quimica Fisica de los Materiales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
fIcahn School of Medicine, New York, NY

Abstract
Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting approximately 3% of adults in the United States (US). While biologic therapies have transformed treatment for psoriasis, the speed and efficacy of response vary among biologics. This network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluates the efficacy and speed of response of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha
(TNF-alpha) inhibitors during the first 8 weeks of treating moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Methods: This Bayesian NMA used data from 53 phase 2b and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Efficacy was measured by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 (≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% reduction in PASI score) at weeks 4 and 8.
Absolute differences (absolute response minus placebo; AD) were calculated using a random-effects model.
Results: IL-17 inhibitors, specifically brodalumab, bimekizumab, and ixekizumab, had the highest AD in PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 at week 4 and week 8.
Discussion/Conclusion: IL-17 inhibitors, specifically bimekizumab, brodalumab, and ixekizumab, had a higher percentage of patients (measured as absolute difference in this study), achieving PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 at week 4 and week 8. However, there was no significant difference in absolute difference for the same endpoints and time points for patients treated with brodalumab, bimekizumab, and ixekizumab. IL-23 inhibitors, while effective, exhibited a slower onset; TNF-alpha inhibitors, except infliximab, generally showed slower responses. Indirect comparisons and differences in study design and populations may limit the generalizability of the results.

 

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory condition that affects approximately 3% of the adult population in the United States (US) and is characterized by the rapid proliferation of keratinocytes, resulting in thick, scaly plaques on extensor surfaces of the body.1 Aside from its cutaneous manifestations, psoriasis can significantly negatively impact a patient’s quality of life and is associated with increased risk for comorbid conditions, including obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, psoriatic arthritis, and psychiatric comorbidities, including depression and anxiety.2,3

Its pathogenesis is thought to involve immune system dysregulations through the activation of Th1-mediated T-cell pathways, resulting in the overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-17, and IL-23.4,5 Understanding the specific mechanisms underlying the disease has led to the development of targeted biologic therapies that specifically inhibit these cytokines, offering more effective and precise treatment options than traditional immunosuppressive systemic therapies.6 While biologics have revolutionized the paradigm of treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis, there remains variability in patient response regarding the onset of action and sustainability of response.5 Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the rate of response and efficacy of biologic therapies within the first 8 weeks of initiation in individuals with plaque psoriasis. By comparing the early response rates of various biologics, this study aims to identify which biologics offer the most rapid and effective control of psoriasis symptoms. Understanding these early efficacy differences is critical for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice.7