Long-Term Skin Clearance With Brodalumab in Patients With Psoriasis and Inadequate Response to Prior Biologics

April 2022 | Volume 21 | Issue 4 | Original Article | 364 | Copyright © April 2022


Published online March 25, 2022

Mark G. Lebwohl MD,a Alan Menter MD,b Edward Lain MD,c George Han MD,d Abby Jacobson PAe

aIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
bBaylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX
cAustin Institute for Clinical Research, Austin, TX
dZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY
eOrtho Dermatologics (a division of Bausch Health US, LLC), Bridgewater, NJ

Abstract
Background: Despite the emergence of multiple biologic drug options for psoriasis, unmet treatment needs remain. Biologic therapies can vary in their effectiveness and adverse events, and many patients experience a loss of treatment effect over time. After lack of response, treatment may be switched to a biologic with a different mechanism of action. Brodalumab, a human interleukin-17 (IL-17) receptor A antagonist, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis with inadequate response or loss of response to prior systemic therapies. Because brodalumab targets the IL-17 receptor instead of the ligand itself, it not only targets a broader set of IL-17 isoforms but also may be effective in patients who received prior IL-17 inhibitors or failed to respond to anti–IL-17 treatment. This is supported by long-term evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies of patients receiving brodalumab who were previously treated with IL-17 inhibitors. Additionally, brodalumab produces reliable treatment effects after use of biologics with other mechanisms of action, such as tumor necrosis factor α and IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors, as well as after the use of multiple biologic therapies. For patients with psoriasis with inadequate response to one or more biologic therapies, brodalumab is an option that has the ability to lead to long-term skin clearance.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(3):364-370. doi:10.36849/JDD.6743

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects 2% to 3% of the world’s population and can be challenging to treat.1,2 For patients with more extensive disease, difficult-to-treat areas (such as the scalp and palmoplantar surfaces), or greater reductions in quality of life, determining an optimal therapeutic regimen is a multifactorial and often challenging process. Biologics have altered the landscape of psoriasis treatment by providing effective and safe options for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis without the need for corticosteroids or other conventional immunosuppressive medications, which may cause liver, kidney, or bone marrow toxicity.

Although biologic therapies have significantly advanced psoriasis treatments, many unmet needs remain. Long-term treatment is required in up to 90% of cases because of the relapsing-remitting nature of the disease.3,4 Although biologics effectively target the inflammatory pathways driving psoriasis, some patients experience reduction or loss of therapeutic response over time.5 Such situations require a switch in biologic therapy, ideally to a drug with a different mechanism of action.5,6 However, given the number of biologics available for the treatment of psoriasis, the choice of therapy after treatment failure requires careful consideration from clinicians.7

The pathogenesis of psoriasis involves the (interleukin)-23– mediated differentiation of T cells into the helper T-cell subtype TH17, which then leads to production of IL-17.8 Interleukin-17 encompasses a total of 6 proteins (IL-17A to IL-17F) that drive inflammation in several cell types, including keratinocytes.8 This cycle of inflammation produces the painful, pruritic plaques seen in psoriasis, which commonly appear on the extensor surfaces of the limbs but also occur in areas such as the scalp, intertriginous areas, and palmoplantar surfaces.9