INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Real-World Study of Topical Corticosteroid-Associated Adverse Events in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
November 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 11 | 10425s21 | Copyright © November 2026
Published online September 18, 2026
Adam J. Friedman MDa, Kristina M. Derrick MD ScMb, George Martin MDc, Elaine C. Siegfried MDd, Melissa S. Seal PhDe, Jennifer C. Jaworski MS BCMASe, Brett Stephenson PharmDe, Raja Mikkili MSe, Robert C. Higham MPASe, Diane Hanna DNP DCNPe, Alexandra K. Golant MDf
aGeorge Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
bSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
cDr. George Martin Dermatology Associates, Kihei, HI
dSaint Louis University School of Medicine, Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St. Louis, MO
eArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc., Westlake Village, CA
fIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
Abstract
Background: Corticosteroids (CS) and topical CS (TCS) are widely used, yet the real-world burden and reporting patterns of associated adverse events (AEs) remain incompletely characterized.
Methods: Reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 1999-2025 containing 18 CS terms corresponding to US FDA-approved topical active ingredients were identified using the openFDA application programming interface. AEs, temporal trends, treatment duration, age, seriousness, and potency were characterized.
Results: 422,947 AE reports identified CS as a suspected cause. Among 1,619,452 coded reaction terms in 294,811 reports with CS as a product, systemic terms (38.8%) were more frequent than cutaneous (8.4%); known CS AEs were infrequently reported. 57.1% of reports reflected ≤2 weeks of use and 12.7% >12 months. Adults aged ≥65 years were disproportionately represented. Regarding TCS, reports showed no clear pattern in relation to potency; however, serious and systemic AEs were more prominent among milder classes. Nearly two-thirds (64.5%) of reports were received after 2018, coinciding with increased regulatory and public attention to TCS-associated AEs.
Discussion: This analysis identifies real-world CS AE reporting patterns not readily apparent from established safety concerns or product labeling. The findings highlight gaps in our understanding of CS-associated AEs and the need to better characterize their spectrum, use patterns, and affected populations. However, spontaneous reporting is subject to biases and cannot estimate AE incidence or comparative risk.
Conclusion: This large-scale analysis characterizes >25 years of CS-associated AE reporting and supports further characterization of CS-associated AEs to inform clinical guidance, regulatory labeling, and patient monitoring.
INTRODUCTION
Topical corticosteroids (TCS) have been in use since the 1950s1 and are currently among the most widely used medications in the United States (US), with over 15 million prescriptions filled in 2023.2 Soon after their introduction, reports emerged describing both cutaneous and systemic adverse events (AEs) with TCS use.3-7 Risk awareness has increased over time, especially for higher-potency agents and prolonged use, and among vulnerable populations (eg, infants, young children, and older adults). Accumulating evidence regarding TCS-associated AEs has prompted increased regulatory scrutiny in multiple countries.8-13 In parallel, growing engagement among medical experts, professional organizations, and advocacy groups reflects a broad shift toward TCS stewardship. Statements from the Society of Dermatology Physician Assistants and the Society of Dermatology Nurse Practitioners support cumulative TCS exposure monitoring as a means to improve patient safety and outcomes.14,15 Efforts to promote more appropriate corticosteroid (CS) use across therapeutic areas, including asthma and inflammatory bowel disease, have also emphasized reducing cumulative systemic CS