Efficacy and Safety of Topical Metformin vs Kligman Formula in the Treatment of Melasma: A Split-Face Study

May 2026 | Volume 25 | Issue 5 | 435 | Copyright © May 2026


Published online April 30, 2026

Eman Ayesha MBBSa, Sumera Hanif FCPSa, Sandy Agaiby c, Maria Elisabetta Greco MDb, Madeline Tchack BSd,e,f, Hooriya Shafiq Butt MBBSa, Aliza Hamadani FCPSa, Rabia Shaukat FCPSa, Talat Akbar FCPSa, Noah Musolff MDf, Bassem Rafiq BSf, Babar Rao MDe,f,g, Haroon Nabi FCPSa

aDermatology Department, Lahore Medical and Dental College/Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
bDermatology Clinic, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Rome, "Sapienza," Rome, Italy
cRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
dRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ
eCenter for Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Somerset, NJ
fRao Dermatology, New York, NY
gDepartment of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Abstract
Background: Melasma is an acquired pigmentary disorder characterized by symmetrical hyperpigmented macules and patches on sun-exposed areas, primarily the face. Kligman's formula, or "triple combination cream," is widely used but has potential side effects. Metformin, an oral anti-diabetic agent, possesses anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties, suggesting its possible role in melasma treatment. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of topical Metformin with Kligman’s formula in melasma treatment through a split-face design study.
Methods: This non-randomized, double-blind, split-face, comparative study included 57 patients with melasma over 12 weeks. Participants applied Kligman's formula to the right side of the face and topical metformin on the left side of the face at bedtime. Efficacy was assessed using melanin index measurements, physician global assessment, and patient satisfaction rates. Safety was evaluated by monitoring erythema, burning, and itching on both sides of the face.
Results: Of the 57 participants, 49 (86%) were female, and 8 (14%) were male. At baseline, the mean Hemi-MASI scores were 7.60 ± 3.44 (right) and 7.72 ± 3.45 (left). At month 3, scores significantly decreased to 3.30 ± 2.30 (right) and 3.81 ± 2.38 (left) (P<.001). The percentage reduction was significant on both sides, with 60.53 ± 15.65% (right) and 53.33 ± 14.88% (left).
Conclusions: While Kligman’s formula demonstrated slightly better efficacy, both treatments reduced hyperpigmentation. Topical metformin could be an alternative for melasma patients with a lower risk of side effects.

INTRODUCTION

Melasma is a frequent chronic pigmentary condition that is resistant to treatment, most commonly affecting Fitzpatrick skin types III to V.1 Worldwide, melasma is one of the most prevalent dermatoses, varying from 9% to 50%.2 The pathogenesis is due to increased melanocyte activity and melanin production, influenced by genetics, ultraviolet (UV) light, hormonal changes, and certain medications.3 The disease appears as symmetrically arranged hyperpigmented patches and macules mainly on the face.4 Clinically, melasma manifests as 3 facial patterns: centrofacial, malar, and mandibular. It can also be classified by Wood's lamp examination into epidermal, dermal, or mixed types based on the depth of melanin pigment.1

The gold standard in treating melasma is Kligman's formula, containing hydroquinone (HQ), but it may cause side effects like contact dermatitis, redness, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, permanent depigmentation, and ochronosis.5 Metformin, primarily an anti-diabetic drug, has emerged as a potential treatment for melasma. It has been studied in various clinical trials for inflammatory skin conditions like hidradenitis suppurativa, acanthosis nigricans, psoriasis, acne, and allergic contact dermatitis, showing promising outcomes. In melasma, metformin reduces cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, which helps lower melanin production in melanocytes by inhibiting key pathways.6