Socioeconomic Disparities in Gentle Skin Care Access for Atopic Dermatitis: Affordability and Pharmacy Deserts

July 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 7 | 8911 | Copyright © July 2025


Published online June 12, 2025

doi:10.36849/JDD.8911

Stephanie Cardenas BSa, Natalia N Khosla MD MSca, Michelle Verghese BAa, Karina Grullon MDa,b, Dima Kenj Halabi BSa, Adena E. Rosenblatt MD PhDc,d

aUniversity of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
bDepartment of Dermatology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
cSection of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
dDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

Abstract
Background: Gentle skin care is key to atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment, yet products are often expensive. Pharmacy deserts may exacerbate socioeconomic disparities in AD.
Objective: To compare the price of dermatologist-recommended skin care to popularly purchased products, and to assess the prevalence and accessibility of pharmacy retailers selling these products in low- versus high-income zip codes.
Results: National Eczema Association (NEA)-recommended products were more expensive than popularly purchased products for moisturizing lotions ($2.72/oz vs $1.13/oz, P<0.0001) and liquid body soaps ($1.30/oz vs $0.35/oz, P<0.0001) across all retailers (Amazon, Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, Target, and Meijer). Lower-income zip codes had significantly lower densities of retail stores than higher-income zip codes in both Chicago (0.26 vs 3.20 stores/10,000 pop, P=0.0007) and New York (0.26 vs 2.90 stores/10,000 pop, P=0.02). Stores in low-income zip codes had fewer hours of operation in both Chicago (14.9 vs 19.2 hours/day, P=0.02) and New York (13.3 vs 21.0 hour/day, P=0.0002) and lower stock in both Chicago (2.0 vs 5.1 units, P=0.05) and New York (1.4 vs 4.8 units, P=0.03).
Conclusions: Recommended products are more expensive than popular products. Retail pharmacies selling these products are less prevalent in low-income neighborhoods, have fewer hours of operation, and have lower average stock, exacerbating AD disparities.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.8911

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting up to 15% of children and 3% of adults.1 Restoring barrier function with dermatologist-recommended gentle skin care is central to therapy. However, over-the-counter products are often expensive, exacerbating socioeconomic (SES) disparities in AD. Low SES patients are more likely to have poorer disease control and higher disease severity than their high SES counterparts.2,3 They are also more likely to live in low-income neighborhoods, raising concerns that geographic location and its impact on gentle skin care access may be an overlooked contributor to AD disparities.4

There is growing recognition of pharmacy deserts, or geographic areas where few or no pharmacies are accessible. Pharmacy desert studies, which extend findings from the food desert literature, indicate that they are most prevalent in low-income and minority neighborhoods.5 Pharmacy deserts may also limit access to gentle skin care products since this is where they are often purchased. However, the association between gentle skin care affordability, availability, and access across city zip codes has not been examined.

Here, we aimed (1) to assess the affordability of dermatologist-recommended AD skin care products compared to popularly purchased products; (2) to investigate whether pharmacy retailers that sell recommended gentle skin care were less prevalent in low-income neighborhoods in 2 cities: Chicago and New York; and (3) to examine how hours of operation, price, and stock levels vary between stores in high and low-income zip codes.6

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data Collection
Prices of Skin Care Products
Products from the National Eczema Association (NEA) “Eczema Product Directory” were extracted as dermatologist-recommended gentle skin care products. For popularly purchased products, the top brand names were extracted from Statistica, a well-known provider of consumer data deriving from market research across industry and government.7 US surveys for 3 product types were used: moisturizing lotion,8 moisturizing cream,8 and liquid body soaps.9 Brand names with greater than 10% response rate were included. Brand names that were not descriptive, such as “Store Brand,” or brands that could not be