Analysis of Therapeutic Interventions for Hypertrophic and Keloid Scarring: A Systematic Review

August 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 8 | 770 | Copyright © August 2025


Published online July 28, 2025

Kierra Jackson BSNa, Alyona Lee BAa, Nabeel Ahmad MD MSEda, Harrison P. Nguyen MD MBA MPHb,c

aTilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, Houston, TX
bClinical Assistant Professor of Dermatology and Health Economics, Tilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, Houston, TX
cHarrison Research and Consulting, Houston, TX

Abstract
This systematic review compares the efficacy of pressure garment therapy (PGT) and non-PGT treatments, such as triamcinolone, verapamil, and laser therapies, for hypertrophic and keloid scars. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies that evaluated the efficacy of PGT or non-PGT interventions using standardized scar assessment scales (VSS, POSAS) were included. A total of 753 articles were screened, and 12 studies involving 397 participants met the inclusion criteria. Interventions on the VSS scale compared included PGT, triamcinolone, verapamil, bleomycin, silicone gel, laser therapy, Botulinum toxin, and massage therapy. Triamcinolone showed the greatest scar reduction (82.2%), followed by Nd:YAG laser (65.44%) and verapamil (57.7%). Early intervention PGT demonstrated a 30.2% reduction, while late intervention PGT showed only a 4.5% decrease. Triamcinolone is the most effective treatment for hypertrophic and keloid scars, but evidence supporting PGT is inconsistent. Further research is needed to standardize treatment protocols and improve clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic scars and keloids represent pathological forms of scarring arising from an aberrant collagen deposition during wound healing.1 This abnormality results from increased fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition.2-4 A hallmark feature of this formation is dysregulated collagen deposition, stemming from a disruption in the balance between the catabolic and anabolic effects of collagen during wound healing.5

The prevalence of hypertrophic scars is estimated to be as high as 70% following surgery, whereas keloids are reported to affect up to 6 to 16% of wounds.2 Certain populations are more susceptible to developing hypertrophic and keloid scars. Individuals with darker skin tones, particularly those of African, Hispanic, and Asian descent, have a higher predisposition for these scars.2 Genetic predisposition also plays a significant role, as a family history of keloids increases the likelihood of development.6

Patients with hypertrophic and keloid scars can experience a spectrum of symptoms, including pain, erythema, persistent itching, and growth.5 These symptoms can lead to both aesthetic and functional malformations, inflicting physical and psychological distress upon the affected individual.7 The severity of symptoms can detrimentally impact self-confidence, leading to emotional distress and compromising the patient's quality of life and mental well-being.5

Treatment options for hypertrophic and keloid scarring include silicone-based products and corticosteroid creams, intralesional steroid injections, laser therapy, compression garments, surgical excision, cryotherapy, low-dose radiation therapy, botulinum toxin injections, microneedling, and systemic agents.8,9

Pressure garment therapy (PGT) is a well-established and widely utilized intervention for managing hypertrophic and keloid scars.10,11 This involves wearing specially designed compression garments over the scarred area to exert consistent pressure.12 Historically, pressure garment therapy was the choice of treatment for hypertrophic and keloid scars.12

Another well-established intervention for management includes triamcinolone injections, which have been considered another standard of care treatment regimen.13 They are historically associated with decreased severity of hypertrophic and keloid scars.9 However, there is variable data to suggest its efficacy.13

Inconsistent data reporting creates challenges in finding consensus for effective management of hypertrophic and keloid scars. As a result, we sought to compare the