Rapid Onset of Itch Relief With Tapinarof in Two Phase 3 Trials in Atopic Dermatitis

June 2025 | Volume 24 | Issue 6 | 600 | Copyright © June 2025


Published online May 30, 2025

doi:10.36849/JDD.8860R1

Eric L. Simpson MD MCRa, Jonathan I. Silverberg MD PhD MPHb, Robert Bissonnette MDc, Linda Stein Gold MDd, April Armstrong MD MPHe, Adelaide A. Hebert MDf, Rocco T. Serrao MDg, Jeannette R. Jakus MD MBAh, Philip M. Brown MD JDi, David S. Rubenstein MD PhDj, Stephen C. Piscitelli PharmDi, Anna M. Tallman PharmDi, Lawrence F. Eichenfield MDk

aOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
bThe George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
cInnovaderm Research Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada
dHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
eUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
fUTHealth McGovern Medical School and Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX
gDermatologists of Southwest Ohio, Mason, OH
hSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, NY
iDermavant Sciences, Inc., Morrisville, NC
jFormerly of Dermavant Sciences, Inc., Morrisville, NC
kUniversity of California San Diego and Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA

Abstract
Background: In the ADORING 1 and 2 phase 3 trials, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) demonstrated significant efficacy and was well tolerated in adults and children down to 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (AD). Here we evaluate the time to onset of itch relief in the trials.
Methods: Eight hundred thirteen (813) patients were randomized to tapinarof cream 1% or vehicle QD for 8 weeks. Pruritus relief was assessed by Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) scores (daily and by visit at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8).
Results: Mean baseline PP-NRS scores in ADORING 1 and 2 were 6.7 and 6.8, respectively. Greater reductions in mean daily PP-NRS scores were observed for tapinarof vs vehicle as early as day 1, 24 hours after initial application (-1.2 vs -1.0; pooled post hoc analysis), with significant improvements at day 2 (-1.6 vs -1.1, P=0.0115). Daily pruritus improvements continued through week 8. Significantly greater reductions in mean weekly PP-NRS scores with tapinarof vs vehicle were demonstrated at week 1 in ADORING 1, -2.0 vs -1.2 (P<0.0001) and ADORING 2, -2.0 vs -1.3 (P=0.0010), continuing through week 8, -4.1 vs -2.6 and -4.1 vs -2.4 (both P<0.0001).
Conclusion: Tapinarof demonstrated rapid and clinically meaningful pruritus relief in patients with AD, with improvements starting 24 hours after initial application and statistically significant improvements at day 2.

Citation: Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Bissonnette R, et al. Rapid onset of itch relief with tapinarof in two phase 3 trials in atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(6):600-607. doi:10.36849/JDD.8860R1

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing-remitting condition that affects approximately 25% of children and 7% to 10% of adults globally.1 Pruritus (itch) is the most bothersome symptom for patients with AD, substantially impacting sleep and health-related quality of life (QoL).2,3

Pruritus is stimulated by the activation of pruriceptive sensory neurons and can be experienced anywhere on the skin or mucosa.4 Cytokines involved in AD pathogenesis, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-31, are also implicated as pruritus mediators.5-8 IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 may directly or indirectly influence pruritus through activation of sensory neurons.5,7,8 Semaphorin 3A is a nerve repulsion factor that inhibits sensory nerve growth; increased epidermal nerve density and decreased semaphorin 3A levels are associated with pruritus in patients with AD.9,10

Important goals of AD treatment include the rapid relief of core symptoms including pruritus, with sustained efficacy, and rapid healing of skin lesions.11 Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are a mainstay of treatment and are generally efficacious when used as directed, but are associated with adverse events (AEs) that can limit their use.12,13,14,15 TCS effectiveness may also be limited by the potential for tachyphylaxis (loss of response).16,17 Furthermore, TCSs have restrictions relating to patient age, duration, and extent of use, and use in specific anatomic locations.16,18 Consequently, TCS use is often restricted,