A four-day old Hispanic female was transferred to our
													institution from an outside hospital for management
													of hemolytic anemia and a rash on her abdomen. She
													was born at 35 weeks to a 33-year-old G4P4 (pregnant four
													times, gave birth four times) mother by urgent C-section for
													preterm labor. The baby was noted to be jaundiced at birth with
													an elevated direct bilirubin of 16. She additionally had thrombocytopenia
													and elevated liver function enzymes. A positive
													direct Coombs test and maternal antibody screen confirmed
													erythroblastosis fetalis (or hemolytic disease of the newborn)
													as the cause of her hemolytic anemia. Quadruple phototherapy
													was initiated on the baby’s first day of life.
													The patient received intravenous immunoglobulin on days 1 and
													2 of life for a total of three doses. In addition, she was given a
													red blood cell transfusion for anemia via umbilical catheter, receiving
													furosemide before and after transfusion. On day 4 of life,
													an erythematous eruption was noted on the patient’s abdomen.
													The umbilical catheter was removed due to concern for infection,
													antibiotics were initiated, and the patient was transferred to our
													facility for management of a suspected infection. At our institution,
													phototherapy was discontinued and the patient was given
													an exchange transfusion. Dermatology was consulted.
													On exam, the patient had a well-demarcated violaceous and
													purpuric non-blanching patch on her abdomen and chest with
													minimal involvement of her extremities (Figure 1). The rash was
													accentuated on the central abdomen and chest corresponding to
													the areas most directly exposed to phototherapy lights. There was
													distinct sparing of sites previously covered by the umbilical catheter
													and cardiac monitoring electrodes. There were no vesicles or
													bullae present. A skin biopsy from the abdomen was performed.
													Histopathology revealed extravasated erythrocytes in the
													superficial dermis with no interface reaction or spongiosis
													of the epidermis. There was no necrosis, vasculitis or vesiculation
													(Figure 2).
													Urine and plasma porphyrin levels revealed elevated plasma
													coproporphyrin and protoporphyrin and elevated urine uroporphyrin
													and coproporphyrin. Fecal coproporphyrin was within
													reference range.
													The patient’s hemolytic anemia was treated with exchange
													transfusion with no phototherapy. The rash resolved over
													the course of one week with supportive care and reduced ex-


													posure to artificial light. There was no residual scar or milia
													(Figure 3). Urine and plasma porphyrin panels were drawn
													several weeks later, demonstrating slow resolution of the porphyrinemia
													and porphyrinuria.
													Our diagnosis in this case was transient porphyrinemia of the
													newborn. Paller et al. reported a series of six similar cases in
													transfused neonates receiving phototherapy.1 Five of these patients
													had erythroblastosis fetalis. Porphyrins were measured
													in two neonates. Plasma coproporphyrins were increased both
													neonates, plasma protoporphyrins were elevated in one neonate,
													and urine porphyrin levels were normal. In another case
													of transient porphyrinemia in a patient with erythroblastosis
													fetalis receiving phototherapy, plasma and erythrocyte porphyrins
													were elevated while urine and fecal porphyrins were in the
                     
						





