AestheticsFeatured Articles

Increased Trend of Cosmetic Procedures in Patients With Psoriasis Who Attain 75% or Greater Improvement

By August 25, 2020No Comments

Featured Article

Featured Article

A survey was conducted at a single dermatology center to determine if there was an increased trend in cosmetic procedures in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who attained 75% or greater reduction of the body surface area (BSA) with biologic agents and oral systemic therapies, and if this was related to an improvement in quality of life following psoriasis clearance.

Read more

A survey was conducted at a single dermatology center to determine if there was an increased trend in cosmetic procedures in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who attained 75% or greater reduction of the body surface area (BSA) with biologic agents and oral systemic therapies, and if this was related to an improvement in quality of life following psoriasis clearance.

Michelle E. Walters MD, Delphine J. Lee MD PhD, Paul S. Yamauchi MD PhD

Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition with a negative impact on patient quality of life. The National Psoriasis Foundation states that an acceptable response to psoriasis treatment is at least a 75% reduction in body surface area (BSA) at 3 months after initiation of treatment.

This reduction in BSA has been associated with improvement in quality of life, with clearance rates of clear to almost clear leading to an even greater improvement in quality of life.2,3 To date, there have been no studies examining the relationship between improvement in quality of life following a reduction in BSA, and the increased utilization of cosmetic procedures. Here, we examine the relationship between quality of life and the use of various cosmetic procedures in patients treated for psoriasis with systemic and biologic therapies who achieved at least 75% reduction in BSA.

This was a retrospective study assessing quality of life and the use of cosmetic procedures in psoriasis patients after attaining a75% or greater reduction of the body surface area with biologic agents only, systemic agents only, or a combination of both. This study was conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided informed consent.

Read Full Article Now
Article Cited in this Post

You May Also Like

JDD December Highlights and Editor Picks

| Featured Articles, JDD Highlights, Latest News | No Comments
Curated by the JDD Editors Missed any of our December highlights? December is our Immunodermatology issue and it’s packed with intriguing articles–start to dive in! Catch up with this curated…

Impact of Low-Dose Oral Minocycline (DFD-29) on Skin, Gastrointestinal, and Vaginal Microflora in Healthy Adults

| Featured Articles, Latest News, Rosacea, Women | No Comments
Minocycline ER spares the microbiome: A December JDD highlight In the December issue of JDD we wanted to highlight a randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled microbiome study of DFD‑29 (minocycline hydrochloride extended‑release…
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology JDD Article about The Gastrointestinal Microbiome and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Human Interventional Studies Among Melanoma Patients

The Gastrointestinal Microbiome and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Human Interventional Studies Among Melanoma Patients

| Featured Articles, Latest News, Skin Cancer | No Comments
From the Vault: Fecal transplant may revive immunotherapy responses in melanoma We pulled this February 2024 vault article because it’s been a popular read. It’s a focused review of microbiota‑modulating…

Leave a Reply