Clinical Effects of a Novel Topical Composition on Persistent Redness Observed in Patients Who Had Been Successfully Treated With Topical or Oral Therapy for Papulopustular Rosacea

March 2014 | Volume 13 | Issue 3 | Original Article | 326 | Copyright © 2014

Hilary Baldwin MD,a Diane Berson MD,b Maria Vitale MS,c Margarita Yatskayer MS,c
Nannan Chen PhD,c and Christian Oresajo MD PhDc,d

aDepartment of Dermatology, State University of New York at Brooklyn, NY
bDepartment of Dermatology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, New York, NY
cL’Oréal Research and Innovation, Clark, NJ
dSkinceuticals Inc. New York, NY

Abstract

Rosacea is a condition most commonly characterized by central facial erythema and pupulopustules. There are highly effective drugs, both oral and topical, for papulopustular disease. At the present time, consistently effective pharmacologic therapy for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea is lacking. Patients whose papulopustular disease has been adequately treated are often still bothered by central facial erythema for which there is no adequate treatment short of laser and light. We present a study utilizing a novel topical composition evaluated for its ability to reduce background erythema remaining after adequate care of papulopustular disease. Patient, investigator and photographic evidence of erythema reduction was seen in 24/25 patients in this 8-week study.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13(3):326-331.

Purchase Original Article

Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.

Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.

Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.

To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.

Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.

Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.

→ proceed | ↑ close

INTRODUCTION

Rosacea is a common disorder affecting 16 million people in the US alone.1 Despite earlier beliefs that rosacea was primarily a disease of light-skinned Caucasian, middle-aged women, we now know that it affects all races and age groups. Erythema may be more difficult to appreciate in patients with skin types IV and V, but papules, pustules, and granulomatous lesions are commonly seen. It is unclear if rosacea is truly more common (2-3 fold) in women or if men are simply less likely to seek clinical care.2 There are some gender differences, however, as men are far more likely to have phymatous rosacea.3 The diagnosis of rosacea is most often made in patients in their 30s-50s, but all ages are susceptible.4

To truly understand the impact of rosacea, the psychosocial impact of the disease must be factored in. For many patients, the stigma of a “rum blossom” or “drinker’s nose” and the social and professional isolation that result from low self-esteem and prejudice is far more significant than the clinical appearance alone.

It is a clinical reality that we don’t truly treat rosacea, but rather manage it: we do not offer cure but control. As with all incurable conditions, frustrations with inadequate therapy and chronicity of therapy plagues rosacea treatment plans. Benefits from a combination of both medical and psychological approaches to care cannot be overemphasized. The overall goal is the improvement of the quality of life of the patient. No two patients will be alike in their needs in this regard. The desire for resolution of persistent erythema, however, is ubiquitous.

For the task of discussing therapy, and drawing useful and valid conclusions from clinical data, a classification system based on predominant lesion morphology was developed by committee of the National Rosacea Society.5 In this system, patients are classified as having one of four types: erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, or ocular with a variant form referred to as granulomatous. Individual patients may straddle one or more subtypes, but this system allows us to evaluate therapy based on similar lesion types. Erythema and telangiectasia are the hallmarks of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, but are commonly seen as accompaniments of the other variants.

When measuring erythema and assessing response to rosacea therapy, it is crucial to define the difference between perilesional erythema and “background erythema”. Inflammatory lesions of rosacea are, by definition, red. There is often significant surrounding erythema as a result of the inflammatory process. As lesions resolve with therapy, the lesional and perilesional erythema improves. Particularly

↑ back to top


Related Articles