Treatment of Severe Psoriasis With Ustekinumab During Pregnancy

October 2012 | Volume 11 | Issue 10 | Case Report | 1240 | Copyright © 2012

Abstract

We present the case of a female, aged 22 years, with a long history of recalcitrant pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, treated with ustekinumab during pregnancy. The result of treatment was an uncomplicated pregnancy with delivery, at term, of a healthy boy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported use of ustekinumab in a human during pregnancy. Following a description of the case, we discuss the characteristics of ustekinumab and review the known information from human case reports, case series, and animal studies regarding the use of TNF-α inhibitors and ustekinumab during pregnancy. We also provide a short discussion of administration of ustekinumab during the time period when a mother is nursing and the potential for complications to infants in this setting.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(10):1240-1241.

Purchase Original Article

Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.

Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.

Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.

To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.

Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.

Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.

→ proceed | ↑ close

CASE REPORT

A white female, aged 22 years, with severe pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis since the age of 14 years had recalcitrant disease and presented for further treatment options. She had failed to respond to several treatments in the past including topical steroids, calcipotriene, alefacept, cyclosporine, acitretin, phototherapy, etanercept, and methotrexate. Upon presentation to our clinic, she was initially started on infliximab 5 mg per kg IV at weeks 0, 2, 6, and then every 8weeks and demonstrated significant improvement. However, she subsequently developed a malar rash and pericarditis, which required hospitalization. An ANA titer was elevated at > 1:1280. She was diagnosed with drug-induced lupus secondary to infliximab therapy and treatment was discontinued.

The patient was then started on ustekinumab. One week after her first dose she reported that she was pregnant. The first dose had been administered at 6 weeks gestation. Despite the improvement seen with the treatment, ustekinumab was discontinued due to lack of clinical data supporting the medication's use during pregnancy. The patient was started on topical psoriasis therapy then temporarily lost to follow up. At 22 weeks gestation the patient was admitted to the hospital with erythrodermic psoriasis with painful skin and joints. After discussion with the patient, her obstetric team, and the rheumatology service, the decision was made to reinstate ustekinumab therapy and the patient received 2 more injections during her pregnancy, at 26 and 37 weeks gestation. The patient went on to deliver a healthy boy by normal vaginal delivery at term.

DISCUSSION

Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23 and inhibits the action of these cytokines.1 It is a relatively new biologic agent that is used in cases of psoriasis that have failed other treatments. It shows similar efficacy to other biologics for this use and has demonstrated minimal, minor complications.1 However, its safety has not been assessed in human pregnancy and to our knowledge this is the first reported use in such a situation.

Most biologics, including ustekinumab, are rated pregnancy category B. However, safety of these drugs in human pregnancy has not been formally studied. In fact, most safety data come from case reports and series of the use of these drugs in pregnant women or from spontaneous reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes in treated patients. We report this case of a pregnancy resulting in the uncomplicated birth of a full-term infant because to our knowledge this is the first reported outcome of any type of the use of ustekinumab in a pregnant patient. Case reports of pregnancy outcomes are important because to date biologics have not been prospectively studied in pregnant women and such studies are unlikely in the future. However, one uneventful pregnancy does not ultimately confirm a medication's safety for routine use during pregnancy. For example, a case of fatal disseminated Bacillus Calmut-Guerin (BCG) infection following BCG vaccination of a 3-month-old infant born to a mother who was treated with infliximab during pregnancy was recently reported.2

Interleukin-12 has been shown to affect different aspects of pregnancy. For example, elevated and possibly absent levels of IL-12 have been linked to impaired implantation of an embryo due to the cytokine's effects on uterine physiology.3,4 Additionally, in prematurely born infants, higher concentrations of IL-12 are associated with lower rates of fetuses that are small for gestational age.5 An initial report on an IL 12/23 inhibitor similar to ustekinumab used during pregnancy in monkeys described masculinization effects on female monkeys whose mothers were treated with this particular medication.6 On the other hand, a study of ustekinumab treatment during pregnancy and nursing in macaques showed the medication to be safe for fetuses and neonates in regards to mortality, growth, sexual and morphologic development, and immunologic development.7

↑ back to top


  • 1
  • 2

Related Articles