Search Results for "Psychopharmacology"
David Schairer BA, Laura Schairer BA, Adam Friedman MD| |
Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Facial Acne: The Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS)
Stacie Hudgens MA,a* Julie C. Harper MD,b Selena R. Daniels MS,c Benjamin Banderas,d Sepideh Varon,c and Andrew F. Alexis MD MPHf| |
METHODS: Psychometric evaluation was performed using both traditional psychometrics in line with proposed US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria and new psychometric methods, Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT). Assessment of equivalence was also evaluated between Caucasians and Non-Caucasians on individual items.
RESULTS: One-hundred fifty subjects completed baseline and follow-up assessments (89 [59.33%] in the Caucasian group and 61 [40.67%] in the Non-Caucasian group). Psychometric analyses demonstrated that the ASIS Sign and Impact domains both performed well. Each domain fulfilled traditional psychometric criteria (Cronbach’s alpha=0.79-0.92; test-retest reliability=0.75-0.78) and mostly satisfied Rasch psychometric criteria (person-reliability=0.72-0.93; person-separation=1.61-3.69). Select individual ASIS Items also performed well across all measures and were shown to be reliable and valid as stand-alone items. A similar pattern of results were found for both Caucasian and Non-Caucasian racial subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide empirical evidence that the ASIS is a reliable and valid PRO measure that can accurately assess the severity of symptoms and impacts associated with acne vulgaris.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(6):552-559.
Articles are encrypted; any PDFs printed from this website will include a JDD copyright protection watermark.