Acne and Scarring: Facing the Issue to Optimize Outcomes
December 2018 | Volume 17 | Issue 12 | Supplement | s43 | Copyright © 2018
Jerry Tan MD FRCP
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University Windsor Campus, Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Acne scarring can affect patients across the spectrum of acne severity. Of multiple potential risk factors, the most important is acne severity followed by time to effective treatment, manipulation of lesions, and a family history of acne scarring.2 These factors reflect the intensity and duration of inflammation as well as an intrinsic tendency to scar.
Purchase Original Article
Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.
To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.
Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.
Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.→ proceed | ↑ close
The scourge and stigma of acne is only completely evident to those afflicted. The cruel reality for many, even when acne eventually abates, is the facial disfigurement of acne scars. And so, the stigma continues. Others perceive those with facial acne scars as insecure and shy and as being less attractive, confident, happy, healthy, and successful.1 It is unsurprising then that acne scarring is associated with embarrassment, self-consciousness, anxiety, and depression. This issue aims to address this aspect of acne management to optimize outcomes.Acne scarring can affect patients across the spectrum of acne severity. Of multiple potential risk factors, the most important is acne severity followed by time to effective treatment, manipulation of lesions, and a family history of acne scarring.2 These factors reflect the intensity and duration of inflammation as well as an intrinsic tendency to scar.There are 3 conceptual dimensions relevant to interventions in reducing atrophic acne scarring. First, timely and effective therapy of active acne. This requires management to reduce the folliculocentric inflammation so characteristic of acne that leads to atrophic scars. This is the subject of multiple evidence-based acne guidelines currently available throughout the dermatological literature. Secondly, increasing the proportion of newly formed scars that resolve or normalize. Recent studies have found that newly formed atrophic acne scars may not be permanent. In a six-month observational study of patients with moderate inflammatory facial acne, one third of scars forming during that time resolved spontaneously.3 Matrix repair is ongoing during scar formation leading some scars to normalize. The therapeutic challenge then is to increase the proportion of scars that resolve by enhancing matrix repair. This potential was recently evaluated in 2 recent vehicle-controlled, rater blinded, half face studies using adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5 gel, respectively. While both demonstrated mitigation in atrophic acne scar formation and improvement in global acne scar grades over 6 months, adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5 gel also demonstrated a reduction in scar numbers from baseline and compared to vehicle.4,5 The likely underlying mechanism is stimulation of collagen production by the retinoid adapalene.6 Thirdly, the correction of persistent scars. Repair procedures have progressively advanced beyond peels and dermabrasion with the advent fractionated ablative and non-ablative lasers, micro-needling with or without radiofrequency, trichloroacetic acid cross technique, subcision, and fillers. Nevertheless, such procedures are often costly, discomforting, and incompletely effective. Furthermore, there is little high-quality evidence to help direct patients and providers to best corrective options.7 More evidence-based research is an unmet need in this context.In summary, timely and effective therapy for active acne, use of interventions that address acne and enhance matrix repair, and selection of appropriate scar repair procedures, can reduce impact and optimize patient outcomes.
- Dréno B, Tan J, Kang S, Rueda MJ, Torres Lozada V, Bettoli V, Layton AM. (2016). How people with facial acne scars are perceived in society: An online survey. Dermatology and Therapy. 6(2):207-18.
- Tan J, Thiboutot D, Gollnick H, Kang S, Layton A, Leyden JJ, Torres V, Guillemot J, Dréno B. Development of an atrophic acne scar risk assessment tool. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(9):1547-1554. doi:10.1111/jdv.14325.
- Tan J, Bourdès V, Bissonnette R, Petit B, Eng L, Reynier P, Khammari A, Dréno B. Prospective study of pathogenesis of atrophic acne scars and role of macular erythema. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(6):566-572.
- Dréno B, Tan J, Rivier M, Martel P, Bissonnette R. Adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel reduces the risk of atrophic scar formation in moderate inflammatory acne: a split-face randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(4):737-742.
- Dréno B, Bissonnette R, Gagné-Henley A, Barankin B, Lynde C, Kerrouche N, Tan J. Prevention and reduction of atrophic acne scars with adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel in subjects with moderate or severe facial acne: Results of a 6-month randomized, vehicle-controlled trial using intra-individual comparison. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(2):275-286. doi:10.1007/s40257-018-0352-y.
- Loss MJ, Leung S, Chien A, Kerrouche N, Fischer AH, Kang S. Adapalene 0.3% gel shows efficacy for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018;8(2):245-257. doi:10.1007/s13555-018-0231-8.
- Abdel Hay R, Shalaby K, Zaher H, Hafez V, Chi C, Dimitri S, Nabhan AF, Layton AM. Interventions for acne scars. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD011946. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011946.pub2