Injection Depth in Intradermal Therapy: Update and Correction of Published Data
January 2018 | Volume 17 | Issue 1 | Original Article | 88 | Copyright © 2018
Patrick Micheels MDa and Lisa Goodman MDb
aPrivate practice, Geneva, Switzerland bGoodSkin, Los Angeles, CA
BACKGROUND: This paper sought to compare calculated injection depth data with published report claims concerning intradermal therapy and skin rejuvenation of the face, hands, neck, and décolleté. OBJECTIVE: A mathematical formula was employed to assess the injection depth, and data from literature were retrieved and compared with the calculated figures to determine whether the claims about the injection depth proved correct. METHODS: Based on a study by Della Volpe et al., involving 140 skin residues adapted for plastic surgery, we have calculated injection depths from published reports on intradermal therapy and skin rejuvenation while comparing these figures with the published injection depth claims. RESULTS: Most injections were not performed at the claimed depth, with over 70% of them carried out in the fat layer, thus, the hypodermis. This is not the recommended depth for a refined injection technique in the intradermal therapy field. CONCLUSION: Whilst examining our study results, two different possibilities come to mind. We must either: 1) review and correct the existing histological classification; and/or 2) better learn to correctly inject in the superficial-dermis, mid-dermis, and deep-dermis. In other words, a perfect control over the needle penetration angle and implanted part appears urgently required.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):89-96.
Purchase Original Article
Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.
To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.
Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.
Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.→ proceed | ↑ close
Intradermal therapy, or mesotherapy, refers to the direct administration of active drugs into target tissues by means of intradermal microinjections. This technique was introduced in 1952 by the French physician Dr. Michel Pistor.1 The term “meso” refers to the mesoderm, meaning the embryonic middle layer located between the ectoderm and endoderm. All the connective tissues that form the dermis are derived from this embryonic middle layer, and it is into this middle layer that drugs are injected when intradermal therapy techniques are applied. Intradermal therapy is now recognized by the French Health Insurance as an integral part of therapeutic modalities, as it is in numerous other European countries, with this medical discipline currently taught in leading European and American universities.2 In 1976, the First International Conference on Mesotherapy was held, and in 1982, the International Mesotherapy Society (IMS) was created by Dr. Michel Pistor, Dr. Carlo Alberto Bartoletti, and Dr. Gilbert Ravily. IMS encompasses 15 member countries and aims to improve intradermal therapy practices and procedures as a whole. In brief, there are essentially four different injection techniques, which correspond to four different injection depths.3 The crucial question underlying our research was the following: Do the technical terms used to refer to the injection technique actually correspond to the scientific depth of injection attained whilst the injection is actually performed.4This publication sought to prove by means of mathematical and visual methods that the technical terms used to refer to intradermal therapy injections are incorrect when considering the true depth of the actual injection performed. This holds true for general practice, but appears even more pertinent in terms of esthetic medicine, particularly that involving the face, hands, and décolleté.In both general practice and esthetic medicine, four types of injection techniques are used depending on the definitions of the different intradermal therapy injections, meaning the used needle length and gauge, the depth of penetration, and the components of the injected layer.Intra-Epidermal Injection (IED). This is technically not an injection but rather a mild brush of the stratum corneum with the needle bevel.5 The basal layer of the skin is not penetrated. To avoid scar formation, the needle is mostly parallel to the skin, with the bevel of the needle usually facing upwards (Figure 1).Superficial Intradermal Injection (IDS). This is actually the technique invented by Dr. Pistor in the 1950’s, considered to be the gold standard for intradermal therapy. This technique is also referred to as picotage or nappage, the latter being derived from the French and meaning “covering”. For this technique, a papule is created resulting from the injection at the epidermis-dermis junction at 1-2mm depth (Figure 2). The bevel is theoretically oriented downwards during the injection, though it may also be oriented upwards, the decision between “up” and “down”