A Split-Face Assessment of the Synergistic Potential of Sequential Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser and 1565 nm Fractional Nonablative Laser Treatment for Facial Rejuvenation in Fitzpatrick Skin Type II-V Patients
November 2016 | Volume 15 | Issue 11 | Original Article | 1335 | Copyright © 2016
Girish Munavalli MD MHS FAAD FACMS
Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Winston-Salem, NC
Recent appreciation of the multifactorial pathophysiology of skin aging has led to increased use of parallel treatment regimens. This prospective, split-face, randomized study assessed the safety and efficacy of same-day sequential Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and 1565 nm non-ablative fractional laser (SST) facial rejuvenation treatment in comparison to fractional non-ablative laser (NAFL) treatment only. Seventeen patients underwent three treatment sessions, conducted at 4-6-week intervals, in which SST treatment was delivered on a randomly selected side of the face followed by NAFL treatment on the contralateral side immediately thereafter. Immediate skin responses were assessed within 30 minutes of treatment, while wrinkle/elastosis scores, and skin tone and texture were evaluated 1, 3, and 6 months following the final treatment session. While SST and NAFL proved equally safe, SST was associated with signi cantly lower pain scores in all three treatment sessions. Both treatment regimens yielded signi cant improvements in wrinkle/elastosis scores, which were maintained throughout the 6 months of follow up. Physician-evaluated skin tone and patient ratings of skin texture and overall improvement of the SST-treated side were consistently higher than the contralateral NAFL-treated side. Histological analysis suggested a broader effect, alongside sparing of the outermost epidermal layer with the SST versus NAFL treatment. Although the SST regimen failed to demonstrate statistically signi cant clinical superiority over the NAFL regimen, the significantly lower pain levels, consistently higher physician and patient ratings following SST may justify its regular use as a skin rejuvenation technique. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(11):1335-1342.
Purchase Original Article
Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.
To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.
Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.
Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.→ proceed | ↑ close
Wrinkles and fine lines develop following structural epidermal and predominately dermal skin changes. This involves an evolution on the ultrastructural level, upon which collagen I production is downregulated, disorganized, and/or crosslinked collagen fibrils appear and elastin-rich materials accumulate.1-4 This process leads to an aged appearance, and can have both physical and emotional impacts on patient well-being.5 A variety of ablative and non-ablative laser-based techniques have been shown to induce epidermal resurfacing and promote collagen synthesis,6,7 resulting in skin rejuvenation. While ablative approaches improve skin roughness, adequately address facial rhytides, and bring immediate and marked outcomes, their use is limited to very superficial dermal layers8 and is associated with a high risk of complications (ie, erythema and pigmentary changes) and lengthy recovery periods.9 The non-ablative skin rejuvenation techniques have proven effective in improving skin texture and fine wrinkles, and have gained popularity due to minimal wounding, significantly shorter recovery times, and decreased morbidity.10 However, they require a series of treatment sessions, and their efficacy is typically lower.11,12 Treatment efficacy has been improved and downtime further reduced upon introduction of light fractionation options, which allow for sustained thermal injury within microscopic columns, spaced at regular intervals along the tissue surface. The cells of the intervening columns then readily repopulate the thermally damaged layers, which form the basis for improved efficacy.13 Introduction of Q-switched (QS) submicrosecond-long laser pulses enabled selective photothermolysis via preferential absorption by pigmented structures whose profiles vary with the penetrating potential of the applied wavelengths.14 Due to the rapid and selective nature of this process, collateral damage to the adjacent normal tissue is avoided. More specifically, the widely used QS Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser has been shown to effectively clear dark-inked tattoos15,16 and rhytids17 and has been associated with a lower incidence of hypopigmentation when compared to other wavelengths.16 Due to its safety and effectiveness, the technology used at low fluences and high Hz has become popular in skin toning procedures in dark skinned populations.18 This prospective, split-face study aimed to assess whether sequential delivery of non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) and QS laser treatments yield a synergistic effect on skin rejuvenation outcomes in 17 Fitzpatrick skin type II-V-treated patients, in comparison to NAFL treatment alone.