Comparison of Phototherapy Guidelines for Psoriasis: A Critical Appraisal and Comprehensive Review
August 2016 | Volume 15 | Issue 8 | Original Article | 995 | Copyright © 2016
Janna M. Vassantachart MD,a Teo Soleymani MD,b and Jashin J. Wu MD FAADc
aLoma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
bThe Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
cKaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
Psoriasis is a common, chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder that significantly impacts quality of life and has potential systemic complications. The majority of psoriatic patients have mild to moderate disease and are adequately controlled with topical medications. However, approximately 20% of patients have moderate-to-severe disease. Phototherapy has remained a mainstay option for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis resistant to topical treatments due to its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and relative lack of side effects, in particular a lack of systemic immunosuppression seen with traditional and biologic systemic therapies. There are several well-established guidelines for phototherapy treatment of psoriasis proposed in the United States by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), in Europe by the European S3, and in the United Kingdom by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The guidelines set by these groups are largely based on current evidence or expert panel consensus where evidence is lacking. This article reviews and compares the current recommendations of these guidelines for psoriasis phototherapy in regards to the initial clinical encounter, dosage, adverse reactions, and special considerations.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(8):995-1000.
Purchase Original Article
Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.
To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.
Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.
Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.→ proceed | ↑ close
Psoriasis is a common, chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder with potential systemic complications. Psoriasis causes significant quality of life issues, even in mild cases, and is associated with excess all-cause mortality in patients with severe disease.1-7 Current epidemiological studies have demonstrated that psoriasis affects anywhere from 0.45-4.6% of the population worldwide, and the incidence and prevalence are influenced by both ethnic and genetic factors.2,3,5,6,8
The majority of psoriatic patients are adequately controlled with topical medications, a cornerstone of psoriasis treatment. However, approximately 20% of patients have moderate-to-severe disease,3,9 classically defined as a body surface area (BSA) of > 5%, or a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score >7-12 or a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score >10. These patients are often unresponsive to topical treatments and therefore require more intensive options including systemic immunomodulators, biologics, and/or ultraviolet (UV)-based therapies.
Phototherapy has remained a mainstay option for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis due to its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and relative lack of side effects, in particular a lack of systemic immunosuppression seen with traditional and biologic systemic therapies.9 With regards to phototherapy in the treatment for psoriasis, both UVA spectrum and UVB spectrum wavelength have been used with excellent clinical efficacy. UVA light for psoriasis is defined as wavelengths between 320 to 400 nm and is often combined with photosensitizing compounds called psoralens. The combination is termed psoralen and UVA light (PUVA).10 UVB light for psoriasis is further categorized as broadband (BB), defined as wavelengths between 280 and 320 nm, and narrowband (NB), defined as wavelengths between 311 and 313 nm. The purpose of this article is to review and compare the current evidence-based guideline recommendations for the use of phototherapy in the treatment of psoriasis.
Initial Clinical EncounterIndications and contraindications
According to AAD, European S3, and NICE guidelines, phototherapy is indicated for patients with moderate-to-severe “extensive” plaque psoriasis that is resistant to or impractical for topical therapy.9,11,12 The AAD and NICE guidelines also include uncontrolled guttate psoriasis as an indication and define “extensive” psoriasis as a minimum body surface area of greater than 5% and 3%, respectively, or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 7-12.9,11 In addition, the AAD and NICE guidelines provide indications for phototherapy in consideration of quality-of-life. While a minimum body surface area has been traditionally used as a prerequisite to starting UV light or systemic therapy for psoriasis, a subset of patients with limited disease causing debilitating symptoms (ie palmoplantar disease) may be started on phototherapy. The significant negative effect on their quality-of-life of makes treatment with systemic therapies an appropriate approach in management.9,11