Biological Properties of a New Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler: A Systematic Review
January 2015 | Volume 14 | Issue 1 | Original Article | 50 | Copyright © 2015
Derek Ho BSa and Jared Jagdeo MD MSa, b, c
aDermatology Service, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Mather, CA
bDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
cDepartment of Dermatology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are effective and safe for correction of facial rhytides. A new volumizing HA filler, 20
mg/ml HA dermal filler (Juvéderm® Voluma®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA), is the only HA filler with a FDA indication for facial volumization
due to age-related facial volume loss.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the biological properties, including biochemical, biophysical and rheological, of this new 20 mg/ml HA dermal filler and discuss the importance of these properties in clinical applications.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic search of the computerized bibliographic databases Medline, Embase, Embal, Biosis, SciSearch, Pascal, HCAPlus, IPA, and Dissertation Abstracts with key term “Voluma.” Four articles on the biological properties of this new 20 mg/ ml HA dermal filler were suitable for inclusion in this review.
RESULTS: Biological analysis of elasticity and viscosity values of this new 20 mg/ml HA dermal filler demonstrated intermediate properties in three studies and high in one study compared to other HA dermal fillers. This 20 mg/ml HA dermal filler retained the highest elasticity and viscosity values at temperature of 37°C. Histology demonstrated that this 20 mg/ml HA dermal filler has an intermediate pattern of distribution within the superficial and deep reticular dermis.
CONCLUSION: This 20 mg/ml HA dermal filler demonstrated volumizing ability, and maintaining viscosity and free-flowing characteristics for easy injection, tissue lifting, and molding. We hope future research incorporates biological properties analysis of this HA dermal filler in clinical trials.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14(1):50-54.
Purchase Original Article
Purchase a single fully formatted PDF of the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Download the original manuscript as it was published in the JDD.
Contact a member of the JDD Sales Team to request a quote or purchase bulk reprints, e-prints or international translation requests.
To get access to JDD's full-text articles and archives, upgrade here.
Save an unformatted copy of this article for on-screen viewing.
Print the full-text of article as it appears on the JDD site.→ proceed | ↑ close
Dermal fillers offer a nonsurgical approach for reducing facial rhytides and restoring facial volume. From 2000 to 2011, there were more than 13 new FDA-approved injectable fillers.1 In 2013, there were 995,000 soft-tissue filler procedures in the United States, an increase of 8.6% from 2012.2
Silicones and paraffins were initially used for aesthetic procedures to restore facial volume and contours, but complications such as granulomas and paraffinomas years after treatment have made their use for aesthetic purposes less frequent. 3 The main ingredient of fillers currently available on the market include hyaluronic acid (HA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), poly[methyl methacrylate] (PMMA), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA). HA dermal fillers have become more widely used by physicians and a favorite for patients due to its immediate, natural-appearing effects with minimal adverse events and recovery time.
Characteristics of HA Dermal Fillers
HA, a glycosaminoglycan disaccharide, exists naturally in the body with approximately 50% of total HA is found in the skin and has a half-life of three days or less.4-6 The highly charged nature of HA provides its high solubility and high water binding affinity.7 Currently available HA dermal fillers, depending on its HA concentration, cross-link density, and manufacturing process, has different hydration capacity at equilibrium. This is important considering swelling may be a post-injection complication in some high water binding HA fillers. Previous versions of HA fillers have shown to be safe and efficacious for correction of facial rhytides.1 HA provides the flexibility of being reversible and correctable by using injectable hyaluronidase. A review of currently marketed facial fillers described that many adverse events for HA fillers as mild and transient, and common adverse events include swelling, erythema, and nodules.8